Critical review of sham surgery clinical trials: Confounding factors analysis

Abstract Objective Sham surgery (placebo surgery) is an intervention that omits the step thought to be therapeutically necessary. In surgical clinical trials, sham surgery serves an analogous purpose to placebo drugs, neutralizing biases such as the placebo effect. A critical review was performed to...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of medicine and surgery 2016-12, Vol.12, p.21-26
Hauptverfasser: Ciccozzi, Massimo, Menga, Rosa, Ricci, Giovanna, Vitali, Massimiliano Andrea, Angeletti, Silvia, Sirignano, Ascanio, Tambone, Vittoradolfo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Objective Sham surgery (placebo surgery) is an intervention that omits the step thought to be therapeutically necessary. In surgical clinical trials, sham surgery serves an analogous purpose to placebo drugs, neutralizing biases such as the placebo effect. A critical review was performed to study the statistical relevance of the clinical trials about sham surgery in the light of potential confounding factors. Materials and methods For the critical review 52 articles were included. The possible confounding factors have been studied using a structured interpretative research form designed by the authors. This form includes the following ten confounding factors: I), lack of homogeneity among inclusion/exclusion criteria. II), false double blind. III), lack of post-surgery double blind. IV), power of the study. V), sample characteristics. VI), lost patients to Follow-up. VII), gender distribution. VIII), age equilibrium. IX), lack of psychological patient evaluation. X), lack of psychiatric patient evaluation. In most of the studies, at least one confounding factor was present. Results The analysis of the confounding factors showed that they could influence the reliability of the surgical placebo effects. Conclusions The validity of sham surgery should be reconsidered.
ISSN:2049-0801
2049-0801
DOI:10.1016/j.amsu.2016.10.007