Conformity analysis to demonstrate reproducibility of target volumes for Margin-Intense Stereotactic Radiotherapy for borderline-resectable pancreatic cancer

Abstract Background and purpose Margin-directed neoadjuvant radiotherapy for borderline-resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) aims to facilitate clear surgical margins. A systematic method was developed for definition of a boost target volume prior to a formal phase-I study. Material and methods Refer...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Radiotherapy and oncology 2016-10, Vol.121 (1), p.86-91
Hauptverfasser: Holyoake, Daniel L.P, Robinson, Maxwell, Grose, Derek, McIntosh, David, Sebag-Montefiore, David, Radhakrishna, Ganesh, Patel, Neel, Partridge, Mike, Mukherjee, Somnath, Hawkins, Maria A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Background and purpose Margin-directed neoadjuvant radiotherapy for borderline-resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) aims to facilitate clear surgical margins. A systematic method was developed for definition of a boost target volume prior to a formal phase-I study. Material and methods Reference structures were defined by two oncologists and one radiologist, target structures were submitted by eight oncologist investigators and compared using conformity indices. Resultant risk of duodenal bleed (NTCP) was modelled. Results For GTV, reference volume was 2.1 cm3 and investigator mean was 6.03 cm3 (95% CI 3.92–8.13 cm3 ), for boost volume 1.1 cm3 and 1.25 cm3 (1.02–1.48 cm3 ). Mean Dice conformity coefficient for GTV was 0.47 (0.38–0.56), and for boost volume was significantly higher at 0.61 (0.52–0.70, p = 0.01). Discordance index (DI) for GTV was 0.65 (0.56–0.75) and for boost volume was significantly lower at 0.39 (0.28–0.49, p = 0.001). NTCP using reference contours was 2.95%, with mean for investigator contour plans 3.93% (3.63–4.22%). Correlations were seen between NTCP and GTV volume ( p = 0.02) and NTCP and DI (correlation coefficient 0.83 (0.29–0.97), p = 0.01). Conclusions Better conformity with reference was shown for boost volume compared with GTV. Investigator GTV volumes were larger than reference, had higher DI scores and modelled toxicity risk. A consistent method of target structure definition for margin-directed pancreatic radiotherapy is demonstrated.
ISSN:0167-8140
1879-0887
DOI:10.1016/j.radonc.2016.08.001