Impact of migration on the multi-strategy selection in finite group-structured populations

For large quantities of spatial models, the multi-strategy selection under weak selection is the sum of two competition terms: the pairwise competition and the competition of multiple strategies with equal frequency. Two parameters σ 1 and σ 2 quantify the dependence of the multi-strategy selection...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Scientific reports 2016-10, Vol.6 (1), p.35114-35114, Article 35114
Hauptverfasser: Zhang, Yanling, Liu, Aizhi, Sun, Changyin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:For large quantities of spatial models, the multi-strategy selection under weak selection is the sum of two competition terms: the pairwise competition and the competition of multiple strategies with equal frequency. Two parameters σ 1 and σ 2 quantify the dependence of the multi-strategy selection on these two terms, respectively. Unlike previous studies, we here do not require large populations for calculating σ 1 and σ 2 , and perform the first quantitative analysis of the effect of migration on them in group-structured populations of any finite sizes. The Moran and the Wright-Fisher process have the following common findings. Compared with well-mixed populations, migration causes σ 1 to change with the mutation probability from a decreasing curve to an inverted U-shaped curve and maintains the increase of σ 2 . Migration (probability and range) leads to a significant change of σ 1 but a negligible one of σ 2 . The way that migration changes σ 1 is qualitatively similar to its influence on the single parameter characterizing the two-strategy selection. The Moran process is more effective in increasing σ 1 for most migration probabilities and the Wright-Fisher process is always more effective in increasing σ 2 . Finally, our findings are used to study the evolution of cooperation under direct reciprocity.
ISSN:2045-2322
2045-2322
DOI:10.1038/srep35114