Outcomes of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Patients with Myelofibrosis With Prior exposure to JAK1/2 Inhibitors

The impact of JAK1/2 inhibitor therapy prior to allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) has not been studied in a large cohort in myelofibrosis (MF). In this retrospective multicenter study, we analyzed outcomes of patients who underwent HCT for MF with prior exposure to JAK1/2 inhibitor...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Biology of blood and marrow transplantation 2015-10, Vol.22 (3), p.432-440
Hauptverfasser: Shanavas, Mohamed, Popat, Uday, Michaelis, Laura C, Fauble, Veena, McLornan, Donal, Klisovic, Rebecca, Mascarenhas, John, Tamari, Roni, Arcasoy, Murat O, Davies, James, Gergis, Usama, Ukaegbu, Oluchi C, Kamble, Rammurti T, Storring, John M, Majhail, Navneet S, Romee, Rizwan, Verstovsek, Srdan, Pagliuca, Antonio, Vasu, Sumithira, Ernst, Brenda, Atenafu, Eshetu G, Hanif, Ahmad, Champlin, Richard, Hari, Paremeswaran, Gupta, Vikas
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The impact of JAK1/2 inhibitor therapy prior to allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) has not been studied in a large cohort in myelofibrosis (MF). In this retrospective multicenter study, we analyzed outcomes of patients who underwent HCT for MF with prior exposure to JAK1/2 inhibitors. One hundred consecutive patients from participating centers were analyzed, and based on clinical status and response to JAK1/2 inhibitors at the time of HCT, patients were stratified into five groups: (a) clinical improvement (n=23), (b) stable disease (n=31), (c) new cytopenia/increasing blasts/intolerance (n=15), (d) progressive disease: splenomegaly (n=18), and (e) progressive disease: leukemic transformation (LT) (n=13). Overall survival (OS) at two years was 61% (95%CI, 49–71). This was 91% (95% CI, 69–98) for those who experienced clinical improvement, and 32% (95% CI, 8–59) for those who developed LT on JAK1/2 inhibitors. In multivariable analysis, response to JAK1/2 inhibitors (p=0.03), DIPSS score (p=0.003), and donor type (p=0.006) were independent predictors of survival. Among the 66 patients who remained on JAK1/2 inhibitors until stopped for HCT, two patients developed serious adverse events necessitating delaying of HCT, and another 8 patients had symptoms with lesser severity. Adverse events were more common in patients who started tapering or abruptly stopped their regular dose ≥6 days prior to conditioning therapy. We conclude that prior exposure to JAK1/2 inhibitors did not adversely affect post-transplant outcomes. Our data suggest that JAK1/2 inhibitors should be continued near to the start of conditioning therapy. The favorable outcomes of patients who experienced clinical improvement with JAK1/2 inhibitor therapy prior to HCT were particularly encouraging, and need further prospective validation.
ISSN:1083-8791
1523-6536
DOI:10.1016/j.bbmt.2015.10.005