Assessing the Straightforwardly-Worded Brief Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale for Differential Item Functioning Across Gender and Ethnicity

The Brief Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale (BFNE; Leary Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin , 9, 371–375, 1983 ) assesses fear and worry about receiving negative evaluation from others. Rodebaugh et al. Psychological Assessment , 16 , 169–181, ( 2004 ) found that the BFNE is composed of a re...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of psychopathology and behavioral assessment 2015-06, Vol.37 (2), p.306-317
Hauptverfasser: Harpole, Jared K., Levinson, Cheri A., Woods, Carol M., Rodebaugh, Thomas L., Weeks, Justin W., Brown, Patrick J., Heimberg, Richard G., Menatti, Andrew R., Blanco, Carlos, Schneier, Franklin, Liebowitz, Michael
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The Brief Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale (BFNE; Leary Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin , 9, 371–375, 1983 ) assesses fear and worry about receiving negative evaluation from others. Rodebaugh et al. Psychological Assessment , 16 , 169–181, ( 2004 ) found that the BFNE is composed of a reverse-worded factor (BFNE-R) and straightforwardly-worded factor (BFNE-S). Further, they found the BFNE-S to have better psychometric properties and provide more information than the BFNE-R. Currently there is a lack of research regarding the measurement invariance of the BFNE-S across gender and ethnicity with respect to item thresholds. The present study uses item response theory (IRT) to test the BFNE-S for differential item functioning (DIF) related to gender and ethnicity (White, Asian, and Black). Six data sets consisting of clinical, community, and undergraduate participants were utilized ( N  = 2,109). The factor structure of the BFNE-S was confirmed using categorical confirmatory factor analysis, IRT model assumptions were tested, and the BFNE-S was evaluated for DIF. Item nine demonstrated significant non-uniform DIF between White and Black participants. No other items showed significant uniform or non-uniform DIF across gender or ethnicity. Results suggest the BFNE-S can be used reliably with men and women and Asian and White participants. More research is needed to understand the implications of using the BFNE-S with Black participants.
ISSN:0882-2689
1573-3505
DOI:10.1007/s10862-014-9455-9