The Impact of Cognitive Stressors in the Emergency Department on Physician Implicit Racial Bias

Objectives The emergency department (ED) is characterized by stressors (e.g., fatigue, stress, time pressure, and complex decision‐making) that can pose challenges to delivering high‐quality, equitable care. Although it has been suggested that characteristics of the ED may exacerbate reliance on cog...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Academic emergency medicine 2016-03, Vol.23 (3), p.297-305
Hauptverfasser: Johnson, Tiffani J., Hickey, Robert W., Switzer, Galen E., Miller, Elizabeth, Winger, Daniel G., Nguyen, Margaret, Saladino, Richard A., Hausmann, Leslie R. M., Gerson, Lowell
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objectives The emergency department (ED) is characterized by stressors (e.g., fatigue, stress, time pressure, and complex decision‐making) that can pose challenges to delivering high‐quality, equitable care. Although it has been suggested that characteristics of the ED may exacerbate reliance on cognitive heuristics, no research has directly investigated whether stressors in the ED impact physician racial bias, a common heuristic. We seek to determine if physicians have different levels of implicit racial bias post‐ED shift versus preshift and to examine associations between demographics and cognitive stressors with bias. Methods This repeated‐measures study of resident physicians in a pediatric ED used electronic pre‐ and postshift assessments of implicit racial bias, demographics, and cognitive stressors. Implicit bias was measured using the Race Implicit Association Test (IAT). Linear regression models compared differences in IAT scores pre‐ to postshift and determined associations between participant demographics and cognitive stressors with postshift IAT and pre‐ to postshift difference scores. Results Participants (n = 91) displayed moderate prowhite/antiblack bias on preshift (mean ± SD = 0.50 ± 0.34, d = 1.48) and postshift (mean ± SD = 0.55 ± 0.39, d = 1.40) IAT scores. Overall, IAT scores did not differ preshift to postshift (mean increase = 0.05, 95% CI = –0.02 to 0.14, d = 0.13). Subanalyses revealed increased pre‐ to postshift bias among participants working when the ED was more overcrowded (mean increase = 0.09, 95% CI = 0.01 to 0.17, d = 0.24) and among those caring for >10 patients (mean increase = 0.17, 95% CI = 0.05 to 0.27, d = 0.47). Residents' demographics (including specialty), fatigue, busyness, stressfulness, and number of shifts were not associated with postshift IAT or difference scores. In multivariable models, ED overcrowding was associated with greater postshift bias (coefficient = 0.11 per 1 unit of NEDOCS score, SE = 0.05, 95% CI = 0.00 to 0.21). Conclusions While resident implicit bias remained stable overall preshift to postshift, cognitive stressors (overcrowding and patient load) were associated with increased implicit bias. Physicians in the ED should be aware of how cognitive stressors may exacerbate implicit racial bias.
ISSN:1069-6563
1553-2712
DOI:10.1111/acem.12901