Predictors and Survival Impact of False-Negative Sentinel Nodes in Melanoma

Background The status of the sentinel lymph node in melanoma is an important prognostic factor. The clinical predictors and implications of false-negative (FN) biopsy remain debatable. Methods We compared patients with positive sentinel lymph node biopsy (SNB) [true positive (TP)] and negative SNB w...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of surgical oncology 2016-03, Vol.23 (3), p.1012-1018
Hauptverfasser: Lee, David Y., Huynh, Kelly T., Teng, Annabelle, Lau, Briana J., Vitug, Sarah, Lee, Ji-Hey, Stern, Stacey L., Foshag, Leland J., Faries, Mark B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background The status of the sentinel lymph node in melanoma is an important prognostic factor. The clinical predictors and implications of false-negative (FN) biopsy remain debatable. Methods We compared patients with positive sentinel lymph node biopsy (SNB) [true positive (TP)] and negative SNB with and without regional recurrence [FN, true negative (TN)] from our prospective institutional database. Results Among 2986 patients (84 FN, 494 TP, and 2408 TN; median follow-up 93 months), the incidence of FN-SNB was 2.8 %. While calculated FN rate was 14.5 % [84 FN/(494 TP + 84 FN) × 100], when we accounted for local/in-transit recurrence (LITR) this rate was 8.5 % [46 FN/(494 TP + 46 FN) × 100 %]. On multivariate analysis, male gender (OR 2.0, 95 % CI 1.1–3.6, p  = 0.018), head/neck primaries (OR 2.5, 95 % CI 1.3–4.8, p  
ISSN:1068-9265
1534-4681
DOI:10.1245/s10434-015-4912-6