Predictors and Survival Impact of False-Negative Sentinel Nodes in Melanoma
Background The status of the sentinel lymph node in melanoma is an important prognostic factor. The clinical predictors and implications of false-negative (FN) biopsy remain debatable. Methods We compared patients with positive sentinel lymph node biopsy (SNB) [true positive (TP)] and negative SNB w...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Annals of surgical oncology 2016-03, Vol.23 (3), p.1012-1018 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
The status of the sentinel lymph node in melanoma is an important prognostic factor. The clinical predictors and implications of false-negative (FN) biopsy remain debatable.
Methods
We compared patients with positive sentinel lymph node biopsy (SNB) [true positive (TP)] and negative SNB with and without regional recurrence [FN, true negative (TN)] from our prospective institutional database.
Results
Among 2986 patients (84 FN, 494 TP, and 2408 TN; median follow-up 93 months), the incidence of FN-SNB was 2.8 %. While calculated FN rate was 14.5 % [84 FN/(494 TP + 84 FN) × 100], when we accounted for local/in-transit recurrence (LITR) this rate was 8.5 % [46 FN/(494 TP + 46 FN) × 100 %]. On multivariate analysis, male gender (OR 2.0, 95 % CI 1.1–3.6,
p
= 0.018), head/neck primaries (OR 2.5, 95 % CI 1.3–4.8,
p
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 1068-9265 1534-4681 |
DOI: | 10.1245/s10434-015-4912-6 |