Loophole-free Bell test using electron spins in diamond: second experiment and additional analysis

The recently reported violation of a Bell inequality using entangled electronic spins in diamonds (Hensen et al ., Nature 526, 682–686) provided the first loophole-free evidence against local-realist theories of nature. Here we report on data from a second Bell experiment using the same experimental...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Scientific reports 2016-08, Vol.6 (1), p.30289-30289, Article 30289
Hauptverfasser: Hensen, B., Kalb, N., Blok, M. S., Dréau, A. E., Reiserer, A., Vermeulen, R. F. L., Schouten, R. N., Markham, M., Twitchen, D. J., Goodenough, K., Elkouss, D., Wehner, S., Taminiau, T. H., Hanson, R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The recently reported violation of a Bell inequality using entangled electronic spins in diamonds (Hensen et al ., Nature 526, 682–686) provided the first loophole-free evidence against local-realist theories of nature. Here we report on data from a second Bell experiment using the same experimental setup with minor modifications. We find a violation of the CHSH-Bell inequality of 2.35 ± 0.18, in agreement with the first run, yielding an overall value of S  = 2.38 ± 0.14. We calculate the resulting P -values of the second experiment and of the combined Bell tests. We provide an additional analysis of the distribution of settings choices recorded during the two tests, finding that the observed distributions are consistent with uniform settings for both tests. Finally, we analytically study the effect of particular models of random number generator (RNG) imperfection on our hypothesis test. We find that the winning probability per trial in the CHSH game can be bounded knowing only the mean of the RNG bias. This implies that our experimental result is robust for any model underlying the estimated average RNG bias, for random bits produced up to 690 ns too early by the random number generator.
ISSN:2045-2322
2045-2322
DOI:10.1038/srep30289