Effect of liraglutide 3.0 mg in individuals with obesity and moderate or severe obstructive sleep apnea: the SCALE Sleep Apnea randomized clinical trial
Background: Obesity is strongly associated with prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), and weight loss has been shown to reduce disease severity. Objective: To investigate whether liraglutide 3.0 mg reduces OSA severity compared with placebo using the primary end point of change in apnea–hypop...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International Journal of Obesity 2016-08, Vol.40 (8), p.1310-1319 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background:
Obesity is strongly associated with prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), and weight loss has been shown to reduce disease severity.
Objective:
To investigate whether liraglutide 3.0 mg reduces OSA severity compared with placebo using the primary end point of change in apnea–hypopnea index (AHI) after 32 weeks. Liraglutide’s weight loss efficacy was also examined.
Subjects/Methods:
In this randomized, double-blind trial, non-diabetic participants with obesity who had moderate (AHI 15–29.9 events h
−1
) or severe (AHI ⩾30 events h
−1
) OSA and were unwilling/unable to use continuous positive airway pressure therapy were randomized for 32 weeks to liraglutide 3.0 mg (
n
=180) or placebo (
n
=179), both as adjunct to diet (500 kcal day
−1
deficit) and exercise. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups (mean age 48.5 years, males 71.9%, AHI 49.2 events h
−1
, severe OSA 67.1%, body weight 117.6 kg, body mass index 39.1 kg m
−2
, prediabetes 63.2%, HbA
1c
5.7%).
Results:
After 32 weeks, the mean reduction in AHI was greater with liraglutide than with placebo (−12.2 vs −6.1 events h
−1
, estimated treatment difference: −6.1 events h
−1
(95% confidence interval (CI), −11.0 to −1.2),
P
=0.0150). Liraglutide produced greater mean percentage weight loss compared with placebo (−5.7% vs −1.6%, estimated treatment difference: −4.2% (95% CI, −5.2 to −3.1%),
P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0307-0565 1476-5497 |
DOI: | 10.1038/ijo.2016.52 |