Structural propensities of kinase family proteins from a Potts model of residue co‐variation

Understanding the conformational propensities of proteins is key to solving many problems in structural biology and biophysics. The co‐variation of pairs of mutations contained in multiple sequence alignments of protein families can be used to build a Potts Hamiltonian model of the sequence patterns...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Protein science 2016-08, Vol.25 (8), p.1378-1384
Hauptverfasser: Haldane, Allan, Flynn, William F., He, Peng, Vijayan, R.S.K., Levy, Ronald M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Understanding the conformational propensities of proteins is key to solving many problems in structural biology and biophysics. The co‐variation of pairs of mutations contained in multiple sequence alignments of protein families can be used to build a Potts Hamiltonian model of the sequence patterns which accurately predicts structural contacts. This observation paves the way to develop deeper connections between evolutionary fitness landscapes of entire protein families and the corresponding free energy landscapes which determine the conformational propensities of individual proteins. Using statistical energies determined from the Potts model and an alignment of 2896 PDB structures, we predict the propensity for particular kinase family proteins to assume a “DFG‐out” conformation implicated in the susceptibility of some kinases to type‐II inhibitors, and validate the predictions by comparison with the observed structural propensities of the corresponding proteins and experimental binding affinity data. We decompose the statistical energies to investigate which interactions contribute the most to the conformational preference for particular sequences and the corresponding proteins. We find that interactions involving the activation loop and the C‐helix and HRD motif are primarily responsible for stabilizing the DFG‐in state. This work illustrates how structural free energy landscapes and fitness landscapes of proteins can be used in an integrated way, and in the context of kinase family proteins, can potentially impact therapeutic design strategies.
ISSN:0961-8368
1469-896X
DOI:10.1002/pro.2954