Timing of delivery and pregnancy outcomes in women with gestational diabetes

Background Women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) commonly undergo induction of labor (IOL) at term, but the risks and benefits of IOL are incompletely understood. Objective We examined the relationship among gestational age, IOL, and the rate of cesarean delivery (CD) in women with GDM. Stu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 2016-08, Vol.215 (2), p.243.e1-243.e7
Hauptverfasser: Feghali, Maisa N., MD, Caritis, Steve N., MD, Catov, Janet M., PhD, Scifres, Christina M., MD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) commonly undergo induction of labor (IOL) at term, but the risks and benefits of IOL are incompletely understood. Objective We examined the relationship among gestational age, IOL, and the rate of cesarean delivery (CD) in women with GDM. Study Design We identified 863 women with GDM who underwent either IOL or spontaneous labor ≥37 0/7 weeks. Demographic, cervical favorability, and outcome data were abstracted from the medical record. We compared the CD rate in women undergoing IOL at each week of gestation with expectant management to a later gestational age. Results When compared to women who were expectantly managed, IOL at 37 weeks (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.53; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76–3.06; P  = .23), 38 weeks (aOR, 2.07; 95% CI, 0.89–4.80; P  = .09), and 39 weeks (aOR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.44–1.42; P  = .43)) was associated with similar risk for CD as expectant management after adjustment for nulliparity, body mass index, baseline simplified Bishop score, and maternal age. CD rates were higher in nulliparous women, but did not differ significantly in those undergoing IOL or expectant management. In multiparous women, IOL was significantly associated with an increased risk for CD at 38 weeks (aOR, 7.47; 95% CI, 1.6–34.8; P  = .01) and rates of CD (17.39% vs 2.2%, P  = .001) were significantly higher in multiparous women with an unfavorable Bishop score induced
ISSN:0002-9378
1097-6868
DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2016.03.006