Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of three flowable compomers on enamel of primary teeth: An in-vitro study

Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of three flowable compomers on enamel of primary teeth: An in-vitro study

The aim of the present study was to determine Shear bond strength (SBS) of different flowable compomers on the enamel surface of primary teeth. The null hypothesis to be tested was that none of the flowable compomer would differ significantly from the other two with respect to SBS. As a result, the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry 2016-07, Vol.8 (3), p.e322-e326
Hauptverfasser: Gungor, OE, Erdogan, Y, Yalçın-Gungor, A, Alkis, H
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e326
container_issue 3
container_start_page e322
container_title Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry
container_volume 8
creator Gungor, OE
Erdogan, Y
Yalçın-Gungor, A
Alkis, H
description The aim of the present study was to determine Shear bond strength (SBS) of different flowable compomers on the enamel surface of primary teeth. The null hypothesis to be tested was that none of the flowable compomer would differ significantly from the other two with respect to SBS. As a result, the tested materials that have the easiest application on child patient is preferred. Sixty newly extracted non carious primary molars were selected. The buccal surface was cleaned and polished to obtain a flat enamel surface. The specimens were randomly divided into three groups of 20 teeth each, based on the flowable compomers applied, as follows: group I: Dyract Flow® (Dentsply, Konstanz, Germany); group II: Twinky Star Flow® (Voco, Cuxhaven, Germany); and group III: R&D Series Nova Compomer Flow® (Imicryl, Konya, Turkey). SBS in group II (6.78± 0.45 MPa) were significantly lower than groups I and III (8.30 ± 0.29 and 8.43 ± 0.66 MPa, respectively) (P
doi_str_mv 10.4317/jced.52785
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4930644</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1803452340</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2935-3666b8ace13e41cf7757101ac3d188acc38322932391d828d43bbcde408d90af3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkU1LxDAQhoMorqgXf4DkKELXpEm3qQdBFr9A8KLnkCbTbaVN1iTdZf-9WV1F5zLDzDPvDLwInVEy5YyWV-8azLTIS1HsoSNaiSoruBD7f-oJOg3hnaQoKcsFPUSTvGSVoKI4Quu5G5bKq9itAMNK9WMqncWuwaEF5XHtrMEherCL2G7bsfUAuOndWtU9YJ323QA-4LQFVg3Qb6ml7wblNzgCxPYa31rc2WzVRe-S2Gg2J-igUX2A010-Rm_3d6_zx-z55eFpfvuc6bxiRcZms1ktlAbKgFPdlGVRUkKVZoaK1NdMsDyROauoEbkwnNW1NsCJMBVRDTtGN9-6y7EewGiw0ate7t6TTnXy_8R2rVy4leQVIzPOk8DFTsC7jxFClEMXNPS9suDGIKkgjBc54yShl9-o9i4ED83vGUrk1iy5NUt-mZXg87-P_aI_1rBPdKqSgQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1803452340</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of three flowable compomers on enamel of primary teeth: An in-vitro study</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Gungor, OE ; Erdogan, Y ; Yalçın-Gungor, A ; Alkis, H</creator><creatorcontrib>Gungor, OE ; Erdogan, Y ; Yalçın-Gungor, A ; Alkis, H</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of the present study was to determine Shear bond strength (SBS) of different flowable compomers on the enamel surface of primary teeth. The null hypothesis to be tested was that none of the flowable compomer would differ significantly from the other two with respect to SBS. As a result, the tested materials that have the easiest application on child patient is preferred. Sixty newly extracted non carious primary molars were selected. The buccal surface was cleaned and polished to obtain a flat enamel surface. The specimens were randomly divided into three groups of 20 teeth each, based on the flowable compomers applied, as follows: group I: Dyract Flow® (Dentsply, Konstanz, Germany); group II: Twinky Star Flow® (Voco, Cuxhaven, Germany); and group III: R&amp;D Series Nova Compomer Flow® (Imicryl, Konya, Turkey). SBS in group II (6.78± 0.45 MPa) were significantly lower than groups I and III (8.30 ± 0.29 and 8.43 ± 0.66 MPa, respectively) (P&lt;.001). No significant difference was found between groups I and III (P&lt;.05). Significant differences existed between the SBS of the groups. Therefore, the null hypothesis was rejected. Flowable compomers can provide adequate SBS with self-etching system at restoration of primary teeth. Thus, successful restorations in pediatric patients can be done in a practical way. Flowable compomer, primary teeth, shear bond strength.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1989-5488</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1989-5488</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4317/jced.52785</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27398185</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Spain: Medicina Oral S.L</publisher><ispartof>Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2016-07, Vol.8 (3), p.e322-e326</ispartof><rights>Copyright: © 2016 Medicina Oral S.L. 2016</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2935-3666b8ace13e41cf7757101ac3d188acc38322932391d828d43bbcde408d90af3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4930644/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4930644/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27398185$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gungor, OE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erdogan, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yalçın-Gungor, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alkis, H</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of three flowable compomers on enamel of primary teeth: An in-vitro study</title><title>Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry</title><addtitle>J Clin Exp Dent</addtitle><description>The aim of the present study was to determine Shear bond strength (SBS) of different flowable compomers on the enamel surface of primary teeth. The null hypothesis to be tested was that none of the flowable compomer would differ significantly from the other two with respect to SBS. As a result, the tested materials that have the easiest application on child patient is preferred. Sixty newly extracted non carious primary molars were selected. The buccal surface was cleaned and polished to obtain a flat enamel surface. The specimens were randomly divided into three groups of 20 teeth each, based on the flowable compomers applied, as follows: group I: Dyract Flow® (Dentsply, Konstanz, Germany); group II: Twinky Star Flow® (Voco, Cuxhaven, Germany); and group III: R&amp;D Series Nova Compomer Flow® (Imicryl, Konya, Turkey). SBS in group II (6.78± 0.45 MPa) were significantly lower than groups I and III (8.30 ± 0.29 and 8.43 ± 0.66 MPa, respectively) (P&lt;.001). No significant difference was found between groups I and III (P&lt;.05). Significant differences existed between the SBS of the groups. Therefore, the null hypothesis was rejected. Flowable compomers can provide adequate SBS with self-etching system at restoration of primary teeth. Thus, successful restorations in pediatric patients can be done in a practical way. Flowable compomer, primary teeth, shear bond strength.</description><issn>1989-5488</issn><issn>1989-5488</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkU1LxDAQhoMorqgXf4DkKELXpEm3qQdBFr9A8KLnkCbTbaVN1iTdZf-9WV1F5zLDzDPvDLwInVEy5YyWV-8azLTIS1HsoSNaiSoruBD7f-oJOg3hnaQoKcsFPUSTvGSVoKI4Quu5G5bKq9itAMNK9WMqncWuwaEF5XHtrMEherCL2G7bsfUAuOndWtU9YJ323QA-4LQFVg3Qb6ml7wblNzgCxPYa31rc2WzVRe-S2Gg2J-igUX2A010-Rm_3d6_zx-z55eFpfvuc6bxiRcZms1ktlAbKgFPdlGVRUkKVZoaK1NdMsDyROauoEbkwnNW1NsCJMBVRDTtGN9-6y7EewGiw0ate7t6TTnXy_8R2rVy4leQVIzPOk8DFTsC7jxFClEMXNPS9suDGIKkgjBc54yShl9-o9i4ED83vGUrk1iy5NUt-mZXg87-P_aI_1rBPdKqSgQ</recordid><startdate>20160701</startdate><enddate>20160701</enddate><creator>Gungor, OE</creator><creator>Erdogan, Y</creator><creator>Yalçın-Gungor, A</creator><creator>Alkis, H</creator><general>Medicina Oral S.L</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160701</creationdate><title>Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of three flowable compomers on enamel of primary teeth: An in-vitro study</title><author>Gungor, OE ; Erdogan, Y ; Yalçın-Gungor, A ; Alkis, H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2935-3666b8ace13e41cf7757101ac3d188acc38322932391d828d43bbcde408d90af3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gungor, OE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erdogan, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yalçın-Gungor, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alkis, H</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gungor, OE</au><au>Erdogan, Y</au><au>Yalçın-Gungor, A</au><au>Alkis, H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of three flowable compomers on enamel of primary teeth: An in-vitro study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Exp Dent</addtitle><date>2016-07-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>e322</spage><epage>e326</epage><pages>e322-e326</pages><issn>1989-5488</issn><eissn>1989-5488</eissn><abstract>The aim of the present study was to determine Shear bond strength (SBS) of different flowable compomers on the enamel surface of primary teeth. The null hypothesis to be tested was that none of the flowable compomer would differ significantly from the other two with respect to SBS. As a result, the tested materials that have the easiest application on child patient is preferred. Sixty newly extracted non carious primary molars were selected. The buccal surface was cleaned and polished to obtain a flat enamel surface. The specimens were randomly divided into three groups of 20 teeth each, based on the flowable compomers applied, as follows: group I: Dyract Flow® (Dentsply, Konstanz, Germany); group II: Twinky Star Flow® (Voco, Cuxhaven, Germany); and group III: R&amp;D Series Nova Compomer Flow® (Imicryl, Konya, Turkey). SBS in group II (6.78± 0.45 MPa) were significantly lower than groups I and III (8.30 ± 0.29 and 8.43 ± 0.66 MPa, respectively) (P&lt;.001). No significant difference was found between groups I and III (P&lt;.05). Significant differences existed between the SBS of the groups. Therefore, the null hypothesis was rejected. Flowable compomers can provide adequate SBS with self-etching system at restoration of primary teeth. Thus, successful restorations in pediatric patients can be done in a practical way. Flowable compomer, primary teeth, shear bond strength.</abstract><cop>Spain</cop><pub>Medicina Oral S.L</pub><pmid>27398185</pmid><doi>10.4317/jced.52785</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1989-5488
ispartof Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2016-07, Vol.8 (3), p.e322-e326
issn 1989-5488
1989-5488
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4930644
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; PubMed Central Open Access
title Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of three flowable compomers on enamel of primary teeth: An in-vitro study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T00%3A51%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20evaluation%20of%20shear%20bond%20strength%20of%20three%20flowable%20compomers%20on%20enamel%20of%20primary%20teeth:%20An%20in-vitro%20study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20and%20experimental%20dentistry&rft.au=Gungor,%20OE&rft.date=2016-07-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=e322&rft.epage=e326&rft.pages=e322-e326&rft.issn=1989-5488&rft.eissn=1989-5488&rft_id=info:doi/10.4317/jced.52785&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1803452340%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1803452340&rft_id=info:pmid/27398185&rfr_iscdi=true