Dominant eye and visual evoked potential of patients with myopic anisometropia
A prospective nonrandomized controlled study was conducted to explore the association between ocular dominance and degree of myopia in patients with anisometropia and to investigate the character of visual evoked potential (VEP) in high anisometropias. 1771 young myopia cases including 790 anisometr...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | BioMed research international 2016-01, Vol.2016 (2016), p.1-6 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 6 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2016 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | BioMed research international |
container_volume | 2016 |
creator | Wang, Qing Wu, Yili Liu, Wenwen Gao, Lin |
description | A prospective nonrandomized controlled study was conducted to explore the association between ocular dominance and degree of myopia in patients with anisometropia and to investigate the character of visual evoked potential (VEP) in high anisometropias. 1771 young myopia cases including 790 anisometropias were recruited. We found no significant relation between ocular dominance and spherical equivalent (SE) refraction in all subjects. On average for subjects with anisometropia 1.0–1.75 D, there was no significant difference in SE power between dominant and nondominant eyes, while, in SE anisometropia ≥1.75 D group, the degree of myopia was significantly higher in nondominant eyes than in dominant eyes. The trend was more significant in SE anisometropia ≥2.5 D group. There was no significant difference in higher-order aberrations between dominant eye and nondominant eye either in the whole study candidates or in any anisometropia groups. In anisometropias >2.0 D, the N75 latency of nondominant eye was longer than that of dominant eye. Our results suggested that, with the increase of anisometropia, nondominant eye had a tendency of higher refraction and N75 wave latency of nondominant eye was longer than that of dominant eye in high anisometropias. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1155/2016/5064892 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4909916</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A520715159</galeid><sourcerecordid>A520715159</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c531t-c03dbf360ef41334818bc8b5cbaaca8614b72e3441920872ce8773cdcf5317e73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhi1ERaulN66gSFyQ6FJ_f1yQqkJLpQoucLYcZ9J1SewQJ1vtv8erXZbCpb7YYz_zemZehF4R_IEQIc4pJvJcYMm1oc_QCWWELyXh5PnhzNgxOs35HpelicRGvkDHVDGOpcQn6Oun1Ifo4lTBBioXm2od8uy6CtbpJzTVkCaIUygXqa0GN4US5eohTKuq36Qh-JITcuphGkvkXqKj1nUZTvf7Av24-vz98svy9tv1zeXF7dILRqalx6ypWyYxtLxUyDXRtde18LVz3unSQa0oMM6JoVgr6kErxXzj25KuQLEF-rjTHea6h8aXqkbX2WEMvRs3Nrlg_32JYWXv0tpyg40hsgi82wuM6dcMebJ9yB66zkVIc7ZEYy3L_4w-jSpjhNCcioK-_Q-9T_MYyyS2lNBUGCb_UneuAxtim0qJfitqLwTFighSuAU621F-TDmP0B66I9huzbdb8-3e_IK_eTyRA_zH6gK83wGrEBv3EJ6Se72joTDQugMttWTYsN_PAL7w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1795825936</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dominant eye and visual evoked potential of patients with myopic anisometropia</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>Wiley Online Library Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Wang, Qing ; Wu, Yili ; Liu, Wenwen ; Gao, Lin</creator><contributor>Mizota, Atsushi</contributor><creatorcontrib>Wang, Qing ; Wu, Yili ; Liu, Wenwen ; Gao, Lin ; Mizota, Atsushi</creatorcontrib><description>A prospective nonrandomized controlled study was conducted to explore the association between ocular dominance and degree of myopia in patients with anisometropia and to investigate the character of visual evoked potential (VEP) in high anisometropias. 1771 young myopia cases including 790 anisometropias were recruited. We found no significant relation between ocular dominance and spherical equivalent (SE) refraction in all subjects. On average for subjects with anisometropia 1.0–1.75 D, there was no significant difference in SE power between dominant and nondominant eyes, while, in SE anisometropia ≥1.75 D group, the degree of myopia was significantly higher in nondominant eyes than in dominant eyes. The trend was more significant in SE anisometropia ≥2.5 D group. There was no significant difference in higher-order aberrations between dominant eye and nondominant eye either in the whole study candidates or in any anisometropia groups. In anisometropias >2.0 D, the N75 latency of nondominant eye was longer than that of dominant eye. Our results suggested that, with the increase of anisometropia, nondominant eye had a tendency of higher refraction and N75 wave latency of nondominant eye was longer than that of dominant eye in high anisometropias.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2314-6133</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2314-6141</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1155/2016/5064892</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27340660</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cairo, Egypt: Hindawi Puplishing Corporation</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Anisometropia - physiopathology ; Astigmatism ; Corneal Wavefront Aberration - physiopathology ; Dominance, Ocular - physiology ; Evoked Potentials, Visual - physiology ; Eye - physiopathology ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Medical research ; Medicine, Experimental ; Myopia ; Myopia - physiopathology ; Patients ; Refraction, Ocular - physiology ; Studies ; Surgery ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>BioMed research international, 2016-01, Vol.2016 (2016), p.1-6</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2016 Qing Wang et al.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Qing Wang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Qing Wang et al. 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c531t-c03dbf360ef41334818bc8b5cbaaca8614b72e3441920872ce8773cdcf5317e73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c531t-c03dbf360ef41334818bc8b5cbaaca8614b72e3441920872ce8773cdcf5317e73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4909916/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4909916/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,725,778,782,883,27907,27908,53774,53776</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27340660$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Mizota, Atsushi</contributor><creatorcontrib>Wang, Qing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Yili</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Wenwen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Lin</creatorcontrib><title>Dominant eye and visual evoked potential of patients with myopic anisometropia</title><title>BioMed research international</title><addtitle>Biomed Res Int</addtitle><description>A prospective nonrandomized controlled study was conducted to explore the association between ocular dominance and degree of myopia in patients with anisometropia and to investigate the character of visual evoked potential (VEP) in high anisometropias. 1771 young myopia cases including 790 anisometropias were recruited. We found no significant relation between ocular dominance and spherical equivalent (SE) refraction in all subjects. On average for subjects with anisometropia 1.0–1.75 D, there was no significant difference in SE power between dominant and nondominant eyes, while, in SE anisometropia ≥1.75 D group, the degree of myopia was significantly higher in nondominant eyes than in dominant eyes. The trend was more significant in SE anisometropia ≥2.5 D group. There was no significant difference in higher-order aberrations between dominant eye and nondominant eye either in the whole study candidates or in any anisometropia groups. In anisometropias >2.0 D, the N75 latency of nondominant eye was longer than that of dominant eye. Our results suggested that, with the increase of anisometropia, nondominant eye had a tendency of higher refraction and N75 wave latency of nondominant eye was longer than that of dominant eye in high anisometropias.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anisometropia - physiopathology</subject><subject>Astigmatism</subject><subject>Corneal Wavefront Aberration - physiopathology</subject><subject>Dominance, Ocular - physiology</subject><subject>Evoked Potentials, Visual - physiology</subject><subject>Eye - physiopathology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medicine, Experimental</subject><subject>Myopia</subject><subject>Myopia - physiopathology</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Refraction, Ocular - physiology</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>2314-6133</issn><issn>2314-6141</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RHX</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhi1ERaulN66gSFyQ6FJ_f1yQqkJLpQoucLYcZ9J1SewQJ1vtv8erXZbCpb7YYz_zemZehF4R_IEQIc4pJvJcYMm1oc_QCWWELyXh5PnhzNgxOs35HpelicRGvkDHVDGOpcQn6Oun1Ifo4lTBBioXm2od8uy6CtbpJzTVkCaIUygXqa0GN4US5eohTKuq36Qh-JITcuphGkvkXqKj1nUZTvf7Av24-vz98svy9tv1zeXF7dILRqalx6ypWyYxtLxUyDXRtde18LVz3unSQa0oMM6JoVgr6kErxXzj25KuQLEF-rjTHea6h8aXqkbX2WEMvRs3Nrlg_32JYWXv0tpyg40hsgi82wuM6dcMebJ9yB66zkVIc7ZEYy3L_4w-jSpjhNCcioK-_Q-9T_MYyyS2lNBUGCb_UneuAxtim0qJfitqLwTFighSuAU621F-TDmP0B66I9huzbdb8-3e_IK_eTyRA_zH6gK83wGrEBv3EJ6Se72joTDQugMttWTYsN_PAL7w</recordid><startdate>20160101</startdate><enddate>20160101</enddate><creator>Wang, Qing</creator><creator>Wu, Yili</creator><creator>Liu, Wenwen</creator><creator>Gao, Lin</creator><general>Hindawi Puplishing Corporation</general><general>Hindawi Publishing Corporation</general><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Hindawi Limited</general><scope>ADJCN</scope><scope>AHFXO</scope><scope>RHU</scope><scope>RHW</scope><scope>RHX</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CWDGH</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160101</creationdate><title>Dominant eye and visual evoked potential of patients with myopic anisometropia</title><author>Wang, Qing ; Wu, Yili ; Liu, Wenwen ; Gao, Lin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c531t-c03dbf360ef41334818bc8b5cbaaca8614b72e3441920872ce8773cdcf5317e73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anisometropia - physiopathology</topic><topic>Astigmatism</topic><topic>Corneal Wavefront Aberration - physiopathology</topic><topic>Dominance, Ocular - physiology</topic><topic>Evoked Potentials, Visual - physiology</topic><topic>Eye - physiopathology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medicine, Experimental</topic><topic>Myopia</topic><topic>Myopia - physiopathology</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Refraction, Ocular - physiology</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wang, Qing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Yili</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Wenwen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Lin</creatorcontrib><collection>الدوريات العلمية والإحصائية - e-Marefa Academic and Statistical Periodicals</collection><collection>معرفة - المحتوى العربي الأكاديمي المتكامل - e-Marefa Academic Complete</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Complete</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Subscription Journals</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Middle East & Africa Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>BioMed research international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wang, Qing</au><au>Wu, Yili</au><au>Liu, Wenwen</au><au>Gao, Lin</au><au>Mizota, Atsushi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dominant eye and visual evoked potential of patients with myopic anisometropia</atitle><jtitle>BioMed research international</jtitle><addtitle>Biomed Res Int</addtitle><date>2016-01-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>2016</volume><issue>2016</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>6</epage><pages>1-6</pages><issn>2314-6133</issn><eissn>2314-6141</eissn><abstract>A prospective nonrandomized controlled study was conducted to explore the association between ocular dominance and degree of myopia in patients with anisometropia and to investigate the character of visual evoked potential (VEP) in high anisometropias. 1771 young myopia cases including 790 anisometropias were recruited. We found no significant relation between ocular dominance and spherical equivalent (SE) refraction in all subjects. On average for subjects with anisometropia 1.0–1.75 D, there was no significant difference in SE power between dominant and nondominant eyes, while, in SE anisometropia ≥1.75 D group, the degree of myopia was significantly higher in nondominant eyes than in dominant eyes. The trend was more significant in SE anisometropia ≥2.5 D group. There was no significant difference in higher-order aberrations between dominant eye and nondominant eye either in the whole study candidates or in any anisometropia groups. In anisometropias >2.0 D, the N75 latency of nondominant eye was longer than that of dominant eye. Our results suggested that, with the increase of anisometropia, nondominant eye had a tendency of higher refraction and N75 wave latency of nondominant eye was longer than that of dominant eye in high anisometropias.</abstract><cop>Cairo, Egypt</cop><pub>Hindawi Puplishing Corporation</pub><pmid>27340660</pmid><doi>10.1155/2016/5064892</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2314-6133 |
ispartof | BioMed research international, 2016-01, Vol.2016 (2016), p.1-6 |
issn | 2314-6133 2314-6141 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4909916 |
source | MEDLINE; PubMed Central Open Access; Wiley Online Library Open Access; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Anisometropia - physiopathology Astigmatism Corneal Wavefront Aberration - physiopathology Dominance, Ocular - physiology Evoked Potentials, Visual - physiology Eye - physiopathology Female Humans Male Medical research Medicine, Experimental Myopia Myopia - physiopathology Patients Refraction, Ocular - physiology Studies Surgery Young Adult |
title | Dominant eye and visual evoked potential of patients with myopic anisometropia |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T04%3A45%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dominant%20eye%20and%20visual%20evoked%20potential%20of%20patients%20with%20myopic%20anisometropia&rft.jtitle=BioMed%20research%20international&rft.au=Wang,%20Qing&rft.date=2016-01-01&rft.volume=2016&rft.issue=2016&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=6&rft.pages=1-6&rft.issn=2314-6133&rft.eissn=2314-6141&rft_id=info:doi/10.1155/2016/5064892&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA520715159%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1795825936&rft_id=info:pmid/27340660&rft_galeid=A520715159&rfr_iscdi=true |