Regional Variation in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Survival in the United States

BACKGROUND—Although previous studies have shown marked variation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survival across US regions, factors underlying this survival variation remain incompletely explained. METHODS AND RESULTS—Using data from the Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival, we identified...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Circulation (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2016-05, Vol.133 (22), p.2159-2168
Hauptverfasser: Girotra, Saket, van Diepen, Sean, Nallamothu, Brahmajee K, Carrel, Margaret, Vellano, Kimberly, Anderson, Monique L, McNally, Bryan, Abella, Benjamin S, Sasson, Comilla, Chan, Paul S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:BACKGROUND—Although previous studies have shown marked variation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survival across US regions, factors underlying this survival variation remain incompletely explained. METHODS AND RESULTS—Using data from the Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival, we identified 96 662 adult patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in 132 US counties. We used hierarchical regression models to examine county-level variation in rates of survival and survival with functional recovery (defined as Cerebral Performance Category score of 1 or 2) and examined the contribution of demographics, cardiac arrest characteristics, bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation, automated external defibrillator use, and county-level sociodemographic factors in survival variation across counties. A total of 9317 (9.6%) patients survived to discharge, and 7176 (7.4%) achieved functional recovery. At a county level, there was marked variation in rates of survival to discharge (range, 3.4%–22.0%; median odds ratio, 1.40; 95% confidence interval, 1.32–1.46) and survival with functional recovery (range, 0.8%–21.0%; median odds ratio, 1.53; 95% confidence interval, 1.43–1.62). County-level rates of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation and automated external defibrillator use were positively correlated with both outcomes (P
ISSN:0009-7322
1524-4539
DOI:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.018175