Long-Term Results of Stenting versus Endarterectomy for Carotid-Artery Stenosis

In this long-term follow-up of a randomized trial comparing endarterectomy with stenting for carotid-artery stenosis, the risks of periprocedural stroke, myocardial infarction, or death and subsequent ipsilateral stroke did not differ between groups over a 10-year period. We previously reported the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The New England journal of medicine 2016-03, Vol.374 (11), p.1021-1031
Hauptverfasser: Brott, Thomas G, Howard, George, Roubin, Gary S, Meschia, James F, Mackey, Ariane, Brooks, William, Moore, Wesley S, Hill, Michael D, Mantese, Vito A, Clark, Wayne M, Timaran, Carlos H, Heck, Donald, Leimgruber, Pierre P, Sheffet, Alice J, Howard, Virginia J, Chaturvedi, Seemant, Lal, Brajesh K, Voeks, Jenifer H, Hobson, Robert W
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In this long-term follow-up of a randomized trial comparing endarterectomy with stenting for carotid-artery stenosis, the risks of periprocedural stroke, myocardial infarction, or death and subsequent ipsilateral stroke did not differ between groups over a 10-year period. We previously reported the outcomes up to 4 years in the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial (CREST). 1 No significant difference was shown between patients assigned to stenting and those assigned to endarterectomy with respect to the composite primary end point of periprocedural stroke, myocardial infarction, or death and subsequent ipsilateral stroke. At baseline, the mean age of the patients was 69 years, and at that age the average life expectancy is 15 years for men and 17 years for women. 2 As such, long-term treatment differences should be central to treatment decisions. We now report whether the outcomes after stenting . . .
ISSN:0028-4793
1533-4406
DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa1505215