Comparison of size modulation and conventional standard automated perimetry with the 24-2 test protocol in glaucoma patients

Comparison of size modulation and conventional standard automated perimetry with the 24-2 test protocol in glaucoma patients

This prospective randomized study compared test results of size modulation standard automated perimetry (SM-SAP) performed with the Octopus 600 and conventional SAP (C-SAP) performed with the Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA) in glaucoma patients. Eighty-eight eyes of 88 glaucoma patients underwent SM-S...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Scientific reports 2016-05, Vol.6 (1), p.25563-25563, Article 25563
Hauptverfasser: Hirasawa, Kazunori, Shoji, Nobuyuki, Kasahara, Masayuki, Matsumura, Kazuhiro, Shimizu, Kimiya
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
639/301
692/308/409
Automation
Correlation coefficient
Defects
Eye
Glaucoma
Humanities and Social Sciences
multidisciplinary
Retina
SAP protein
Science
Visual field
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This prospective randomized study compared test results of size modulation standard automated perimetry (SM-SAP) performed with the Octopus 600 and conventional SAP (C-SAP) performed with the Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA) in glaucoma patients. Eighty-eight eyes of 88 glaucoma patients underwent SM-SAP and C-SAP tests with the Octopus 600 24-2 Dynamic and HFA 24-2 SITA-Standard, respectively. Fovea threshold, mean defect and square loss variance of SM-SAP were significantly correlated with the corresponding C-SAP indices (P 
ISSN:2045-2322
2045-2322
DOI:10.1038/srep25563