Development of an Objective Autism Risk Index Using Remote Eye Tracking

Objective Abnormal eye gaze is a hallmark characteristic of autism spectrum disorder (ASD), and numerous studies have identified abnormal attention patterns in ASD. The primary aim of the present study was to create an objective, eye tracking-based autism risk index. Method In initial and replicatio...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 2016-04, Vol.55 (4), p.301-309
Hauptverfasser: Frazier, Thomas W., PhD, Klingemier, Eric W., BA, Beukemann, Mary, Speer, Leslie, PhD, NCSP, Markowitz, Leslie, PsyD, Parikh, Sumit, MD, Wexberg, Steven, MD, Giuliano, Kimberly, MD, Schulte, Elaine, MD, MPH, Delahunty, Carol, MD, Ahuja, Veena, MD, Eng, Charis, MD, PhD, Manos, Michael J., PhD, Hardan, Antonio Y., MD, Youngstrom, Eric A., PhD, Strauss, Mark S., PhD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective Abnormal eye gaze is a hallmark characteristic of autism spectrum disorder (ASD), and numerous studies have identified abnormal attention patterns in ASD. The primary aim of the present study was to create an objective, eye tracking-based autism risk index. Method In initial and replication studies, children were recruited after referral for comprehensive multidisciplinary evaluation of ASD and subsequently grouped by clinical consensus diagnosis (ASD n = 25/15, non-ASD n = 20/19 for initial/replication samples). Remote eye tracking was blinded to diagnosis and included multiple stimuli. Dwell times were recorded to each a priori–defined region of interest (ROI) and averaged across ROIs to create an autism risk index. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses examined classification accuracy. Correlations with clinical measures evaluated whether the autism risk index was associated with autism symptom severity independent of language ability. Results In both samples, the autism risk index had high diagnostic accuracy (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.91 and 0.85, 95% CIs = 0.81–0.98 and 0.71–0.96), was strongly associated with Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule–Second Edition (ADOS-2) severity scores ( r  = 0.58 and 0.59, p  < .001), and not significantly correlated with language ability ( r  ≤| –0.28|, p > .095). Conclusion The autism risk index may be a useful quantitative and objective measure of risk for autism in at-risk settings. Future research in larger samples is needed to cross-validate these findings. If validated and scaled for clinical use, this measure could inform clinical judgment regarding ASD diagnosis and track symptom improvements.
ISSN:0890-8567
1527-5418
DOI:10.1016/j.jaac.2016.01.011