TOURNIQUET VERSUS NO TOURNIQUET USE IN KNEE VIDEOARTHROSCOPY: A MULTICENTRIC, PROSPECTIVE, DOUBLE-BLIND, RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL

To evaluate whether, by using an arthropump (irrigation equipment with pressure sensor), pneumatic tourniquet use could interfere with the duration of surgery, recovery of movement and joint volume in patients who underwent knee videoarthroscopy for partial meniscectomy. Methods: 103 patients divide...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	Revista brasileira de ortopedia (English ed.) 2010-09, Vol.45 (5), p.415-417
Hauptverfasser:	Júnior, Lúcio Honório de Carvalho, Soares, Luiz Fernando Machado, Gonçalves, Matheus Braga Jacques, Gomes, Tiago Pinto de Oliveira, Oliveira, Juraci Rosa de, Coelho, Mauro Gualberto, Santos, Rogério Luciano dos, Andrade, Marco Antônio Percope de, Silva, Guilherme de Lima e, Novais, Eduardo Nilo Vasconcelos
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	Arthroscopy Artigo Original Surgery Tourniquets
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:	To evaluate whether, by using an arthropump (irrigation equipment with pressure sensor), pneumatic tourniquet use could interfere with the duration of surgery, recovery of movement and joint volume in patients who underwent knee videoarthroscopy for partial meniscectomy. Methods: 103 patients divided randomly into two groups regarding use or nonuse of a pneumatic tourniquet were evaluated in five different centers by seven different surgeons. The variables were evaluated during the surgery and seven days after the operation. Results: No statistically significant differences were found among any of the variables studied. Conclusion: There are no reasons that would either justify or discredit tourniquet use in this specific situation.
ISSN:	2255-4971 2255-4971
DOI:	10.1016/S2255-4971(15)30429-8