For avid glucose tumors, the SUV peak is the most reliable parameter for [18F]FDG-PET/CT quantification, regardless of acquisition time
Background This study is an assessment of the impact of acquisition times on SUV with [ 18 F]FDG-PET/CT on healthy livers (reference organ with stable uptake over time) and on tumors. Methods One hundred six [ 18 F]FDG-PET/CT were acquired in list mode over a single-bed position (livers ( n = 48) o...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | EJNMMI research 2016-03, Vol.6 (1), p.21-21, Article 21 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
This study is an assessment of the impact of acquisition times on SUV with [
18
F]FDG-PET/CT on healthy livers (reference organ with stable uptake over time) and on tumors.
Methods
One hundred six [
18
F]FDG-PET/CT were acquired in list mode over a single-bed position (livers (
n
= 48) or on tumors (
n
= 58)). Six independent datasets of different durations were reconstructed (from 1.5 to 10 min). SUV
max
(hottest voxel), SUV
peak
(maximum average SUV within a 1-cm
3
spherical volume), and SUV
average
were measured within a 3-cm-diameter volume of interest (VOI) in the right lobe of the liver. For [
18
F]FDG avid tumors (SUV
max
≥ 5), the SUV
max
, SUV
peak
, and SUV
41%
(isocontour threshold method) were computed.
Results
For tumors, SUV
peak
values did not vary with acquisition time. SUV
max
displayed significant differences between 1.5- and 5–10-min reconstruction times. SUV
41%
was the most time-dependent parameter. For the liver, the SUV
average
was the sole parameter that did not vary over time.
Conclusions
For [
18
F]FDG avid tumors, with short acquisition times, i.e., with new generations of PET systems, the SUV
peak
may be more robust than the SUV
max
. The SUV
average
over a 3-cm-diameter VOI in the right lobe of the liver appears to be a good method for a robust and reproducible assessment of the hepatic metabolism. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2191-219X 2191-219X |
DOI: | 10.1186/s13550-016-0177-8 |