Recommendations for the improvement of bladder cancer quality of care in Canada: A consensus document reviewed and endorsed by Bladder Cancer Canada (BCC), Canadian Urologic Oncology Group (CUOG), and Canadian Urological Association (CUA), December 2015

This initiative was undertaken in response to concerns regarding the variation in management and in outcomes of patients with bladder cancer throughout centres and geographical areas in Canada. Population-based data have also revealed that real-life survival is lower than expected based on data from...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Canadian Urological Association journal 2016-01, Vol.10 (1-2), p.E46-E80
Hauptverfasser: Kassouf, Wassim, Aprikian, Armen, Black, Peter, Kulkarni, Girish, Izawa, Jonathan, Eapen, Libni, Fairey, Adrian, So, Alan, North, Scott, Rendon, Ricardo, Sridhar, Srikala S, Alam, Tarik, Brimo, Fadi, Blais, Normand, Booth, Chris, Chin, Joseph, Chung, Peter, Drachenberg, Darrel, Fradet, Yves, Jewett, Michael, Moore, Ron, Morash, Chris, Shayegan, Bobby, Gotto, Geoffrey, Fleshner, Neil, Saad, Fred, Siemens, D Robert
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This initiative was undertaken in response to concerns regarding the variation in management and in outcomes of patients with bladder cancer throughout centres and geographical areas in Canada. Population-based data have also revealed that real-life survival is lower than expected based on data from clinical trials and/or academic centres. To address these perceived shortcomings and attempt to streamline and unify treatment approaches to bladder cancer in Canada, a multidisciplinary panel of expert clinicians was convened last fall for a two-day working group consensus meeting. The panelists included urologic oncologists, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, patient representatives, a genitourinary pathologist, and an enterostomal therapy nurse. The following recommendations and summaries of supporting evidence represent the results of the presentations, debates, and discussions. Methodology
ISSN:1911-6470
1920-1214
1920-1214
DOI:10.5489/cuaj.3583