Food environments are relevant to recruitment and adherence in dietary modification trials

Abstract Few studies have examined the built environment’s role in recruitment to and adherence in dietary intervention trials. Using data from a randomized dietary modification trial of urban Latina breast cancer survivors, we tested the hypotheses that neighborhood produce access could act as a po...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Nutrition research (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2015-06, Vol.35 (6), p.480-488
Hauptverfasser: Feathers, Alexandra, Aycinena, Ana C, Lovasi, Gina S, Rundle, Andrew, Gaffney, Ann Ogden, Richardson, John, Hershman, Dawn, Koch, Pam, Contento, Isobel, Greenlee, Heather
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Few studies have examined the built environment’s role in recruitment to and adherence in dietary intervention trials. Using data from a randomized dietary modification trial of urban Latina breast cancer survivors, we tested the hypotheses that neighborhood produce access could act as a potential barrier and/or facilitator to recruitment, and that a participant’s produce availability would be associated with increased fruit/vegetable intake, one of the intervention’s targets. Eligible women who lived within a higher produce environment had a non-significant trend towards being more likely to enroll in the trial. Among enrollees, women who had better neighborhood access to produce had a non-significant trend toward increasing fruit/vegetable consumption. As these were not a priori hypotheses to test, we consider these analyses to be hypothesis generating and not confirmatory. Results suggest that participants’ food environment should be considered when recruiting to and assessing the adherence of dietary intervention studies.
ISSN:0271-5317
1879-0739
DOI:10.1016/j.nutres.2015.04.007