Significant improvements in the practice patterns of adult related donor care in US transplant centers

Recent investigations have found a higher incidence of adverse events associated with hematopoietic cell donation in related donors (RDs) who have morbidities that if present in an unrelated donor (UD) would preclude donation. In the UD setting, regulatory standards ensure independent assessment of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Biology of blood and marrow transplantation 2015-11, Vol.22 (3), p.520-527
Hauptverfasser: MBChB, Chloe Anthias, Shaw, Bronwen E, Kiefer, Deidre M, Liesveld, Jane L, Yared, Jean, Kambl, Rammurti T, D'Souza, Anita, Hematti, Peiman, Seftel, Matthew D, Norkin, Maxim, DeFilipp, Zachariah M, Kasow, Kimberly A, Abidi, Muneer H, Savani, Bipin N, Shah, Nirali N, Anderlini, Paolo, Diaz, Miguel A, Malone, Adriana K, Halter, Joerg P, Lazarus, Hillard M, Logan, Brent R, Switzer, Galen E, Pulsipher, Michael A, Confer, Dennis L, O'Donnell, Paul V
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Recent investigations have found a higher incidence of adverse events associated with hematopoietic cell donation in related donors (RDs) who have morbidities that if present in an unrelated donor (UD) would preclude donation. In the UD setting, regulatory standards ensure independent assessment of donors, one of several crucial measures to safeguard donor health and safety. A survey conducted by the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) Donor Health and Safety Working Committee in 2007 reported a potential conflict of interest in >70% US centers, where physicians had simultaneous responsibility for RDs and their recipients. Consequently, several international organizations have endeavored to improve practice through regulations and consensus recommendations. We hypothesized that the changes in the 2012 FACT-JACIE Standards, resulting from the CIBMTR study, will have significantly impacted practice. Accordingly, a follow-up survey of US transplant centers was conducted to assess practice changes since 2007, and investigate additional areas where RD care was predicted to differ from UD care. 73 centers (53%), performing 79% of US RD transplants responded. Significant improvements were observed since the earlier survey; 62% centers now ensure separation of RD and recipient care ( P
ISSN:1083-8791
1523-6536
DOI:10.1016/j.bbmt.2015.11.008