Prospective motion correction with volumetric navigators (vNavs) reduces the bias and variance in brain morphometry induced by subject motion

Recent work has demonstrated that subject motion produces systematic biases in the metrics computed by widely used morphometry software packages, even when the motion is too small to produce noticeable image artifacts. In the common situation where the control population exhibits different behaviors...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.) Fla.), 2016-02, Vol.127, p.11-22
Hauptverfasser: Tisdall, M. Dylan, Reuter, Martin, Qureshi, Abid, Buckner, Randy L., Fischl, Bruce, van der Kouwe, André J.W.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Recent work has demonstrated that subject motion produces systematic biases in the metrics computed by widely used morphometry software packages, even when the motion is too small to produce noticeable image artifacts. In the common situation where the control population exhibits different behaviors in the scanner when compared to the experimental population, these systematic measurement biases may produce significant confounds for between-group analyses, leading to erroneous conclusions about group differences. While previous work has shown that prospective motion correction can improve perceived image quality, here we demonstrate that, in healthy subjects performing a variety of directed motions, the use of the volumetric navigator (vNav) prospective motion correction system significantly reduces the motion-induced bias and variance in morphometry. •Motion correction with volumetric navigators (vNavs) reduces motion-induced biases in gray matter and brain volume estimates.•Additionally, motion correction with vNavs reduces variance in morphometry measures due to subject motion.•Our methods can be used to evaluate the impact of motion on studies with different MRI scanner equipment or pulse sequences.
ISSN:1053-8119
1095-9572
DOI:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.11.054