Differences in Regional Brain Volumes Two Months and One Year after Mild Traumatic Brain Injury

Conventional structural imaging is often normal after mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). There is a need for structural neuroimaging biomarkers that facilitate detection of milder injuries, allow recovery trajectory monitoring, and identify those at risk for poor functional outcome and disability....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of neurotrauma 2016-01, Vol.33 (1), p.29-34
Hauptverfasser: Zagorchev, Lyubomir, Meyer, Carsten, Stehle, Thomas, Wenzel, Fabian, Young, Stewart, Peters, Jochen, Weese, Juergen, Paulsen, Keith, Garlinghouse, Matthew, Ford, James, Roth, Robert, Flashman, Laura, McAllister, Thomas
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Conventional structural imaging is often normal after mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). There is a need for structural neuroimaging biomarkers that facilitate detection of milder injuries, allow recovery trajectory monitoring, and identify those at risk for poor functional outcome and disability. We present a novel approach to quantifying volumes of candidate brain regions at risk for injury. Compared to controls, patients with mTBI had significantly smaller volumes in several regions including the caudate, putamen, and thalamus when assessed 2 months after injury. These differences persisted but were reduced in magnitude 1 year after injury, suggesting the possibility of normalization over time in the affected regions. More pronounced differences, however, were found in the amygdala and hippocampus, suggesting the possibility of regionally specific responses to injury.
ISSN:0897-7151
1557-9042
DOI:10.1089/neu.2014.3831