Structural outcomes in the Cleft Care UK study. Part 2: dento-facial outcomes

Structured Objectives To compare facial appearance and dento‐alveolar relationship outcomes from the CSAG (1998) and CCUK (2013) studies. Setting and sample population Five‐year‐olds born with non‐syndromic unilateral cleft lip and palate. Those in the original CSAG were treated in a dispersed model of care with low‐volume operators. Those in CCUK were treated in a more centralized, high‐volume operator model. Materials and methods We compared facial appearance using frontal view photographs (252 CCUK, 239 CSAG) and dental relationships using study models (198 CCUK, 223 CSAG). Facial appearance was scored by a panel of six assessors using a standardized and validated outcome tool. Dento‐alveolar relationships were scored by two assessors using the 5‐Year‐Olds’ Index. Ordinal regression was used to compare results between surveys. Results Excellent or good facial appearance was seen in 36.2% of CCUK compared with 31.9% in CSAG. In CCUK, 21.6% were rated as having poor or very poor facial appearance compared with 27.6% in CSAG. The percentage rated as having excellent or good dento‐alveolar relationships was 53.0% in CCUK compared with 29.6% in CSAG. In CCUK, 19.2% were rated as having poor or very poor dento‐alveolar relationships compared to 36.3% in CSAG. The odds ratios for improved outcome in CCUK compared to CSAG were 1.43 (95% CI 1.03, 1.97) for facial appearance and 2.29 (95% CI 1.47, 3.55) for dento‐alveolar relationships. Conclusions Facial and dento‐alveolar outcomes were better in CCUK children compared to those in CSAG.