Mosquito larval source management for controlling malaria
Background Malaria is an important cause of illness and death in people living in many parts of the world, especially sub‐Saharan Africa. Long‐lasting insecticide treated bed nets (LLINs) and indoor residual spraying (IRS) reduce malaria transmission by targeting the adult mosquito vector and are ke...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cochrane database of systematic reviews 2013-08, Vol.2016 (1), p.CD008923 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
Malaria is an important cause of illness and death in people living in many parts of the world, especially sub‐Saharan Africa. Long‐lasting insecticide treated bed nets (LLINs) and indoor residual spraying (IRS) reduce malaria transmission by targeting the adult mosquito vector and are key components of malaria control programmes. However, mosquito numbers may also be reduced by larval source management (LSM), which targets mosquito larvae as they mature in aquatic habitats. This is conducted by permanently or temporarily reducing the availability of larval habitats (habitat modification and habitat manipulation), or by adding substances to standing water that either kill or inhibit the development of larvae (larviciding).
Objectives
To evaluate the effectiveness of mosquito LSM for preventing malaria.
Search methods
We searched the Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group Specialized Register; Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL); MEDLINE; EMBASE; CABS s; and LILACS up to 24 October 2012. We handsearched the Tropical Diseases Bulletin from 1900 to 2010, the archives of the World Health Organization (up to 11 February 2011), and the literature database of the Armed Forces Pest Management Board (up to 2 March 2011). We also contacted colleagues in the field for relevant articles.
Selection criteria
We included cluster randomized controlled trials (cluster‐RCTs), controlled before‐and‐after trials with at least one year of baseline data, and randomized cross‐over trials that compared LSM with no LSM for malaria control. We excluded trials that evaluated biological control of anopheline mosquitoes with larvivorous fish.
Data collection and analysis
At least two authors assessed each trial for eligibility. We extracted data and at least two authors independently determined the risk of bias in the included studies. We resolved all disagreements through discussion with a third author. We analyzed the data using Review Manager 5 software.
Main results
We included 13 studies; four cluster‐RCTs, eight controlled before‐and‐after trials, and one randomized cross‐over trial. The included studies evaluated habitat modification (one study), habitat modification with larviciding (two studies), habitat manipulation (one study), habitat manipulation plus larviciding (two studies), or larviciding alone (seven studies) in a wide variety of habitats and countries.
Malaria incidence
In two cluster‐RCTs undertaken in Sri Lanka, larviciding of abandoned |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1465-1858 1469-493X 1465-1858 1469-493X |
DOI: | 10.1002/14651858.CD008923.pub2 |