Buprenorphine implants for treatment of opioid dependence: randomized comparison to placebo and sublingual buprenorphine/naloxone
Aims To evaluate the safety and efficacy of buprenorphine implants (BI) versus placebo implants (PI) for the treatment of opioid dependence. A secondary aim compared BI to open‐label sublingual buprenorphine/naloxone tablets (BNX). Design Randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial. Subjects...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Addiction (Abingdon, England) England), 2013-12, Vol.108 (12), p.2141-2149 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Aims
To evaluate the safety and efficacy of buprenorphine implants (BI) versus placebo implants (PI) for the treatment of opioid dependence. A secondary aim compared BI to open‐label sublingual buprenorphine/naloxone tablets (BNX).
Design
Randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial. Subjects received either four buprenorphine implants (80 mg/implant) (n = 114), four placebo implants (n = 54) or open‐label BNX (12–16 mg/day) (n = 119).
Setting
Twenty addiction treatment centers.
Participants
Adult out‐patients (ages 18–65) with DSM‐IV‐TR opioid dependence.
Measurements
The primary efficacy end‐point was the percentage of urine samples negative for opioids collected from weeks 1 to 24, examined as a cumulative distribution function (CDF).
Findings
The BI CDF was significantly different from placebo (P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0965-2140 1360-0443 |
DOI: | 10.1111/add.12315 |