Participation strategies and student performance: An undergraduate health science retrospective study

This research explores participatory evidence-based teaching methods in a health science course to see if a relationship emerged between the level of student participation and course performance, the type of participation and course performance, or the amount of participation and course performance...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of chiropractic education 2015-10, Vol.29 (2), p.134-138
Hauptverfasser: Starmer, David J, Duquette, Sean, Howard, Loretta
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 138
container_issue 2
container_start_page 134
container_title The Journal of chiropractic education
container_volume 29
creator Starmer, David J
Duquette, Sean
Howard, Loretta
description This research explores participatory evidence-based teaching methods in a health science course to see if a relationship emerged between the level of student participation and course performance, the type of participation and course performance, or the amount of participation and course performance and level of demonstrated learning. Level of student participation was dichotomous (100% or
doi_str_mv 10.7899/JCE-14-20
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4582611</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1716942876</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-d7e4c3c60176d0989378ecdd060e4344a576f0f0b849115ef7900af1bc51f9743</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkU1LxDAQhoMoun4c_APSox6qkyZpWg_CsviJoAcFbyGbTHcj3bYmqeC_N36ip5lhHt55h5eQfQrHsqrrk5vZeU55XsAamRRMpk7A0zqZUOBFLkCILbIdwjOAYIKLTbJVlFCwqmYTgvfaR2fcoKPruyxEryMuHIZMdzaNo8UuZgP6pvcr3Rk8zaZdNnYW_cJrOyY6W6Ju4zILxmECMo_R92FAE90rfkq87ZKNRrcB977rDnm8OH-YXeW3d5fXs-ltbhiImFuJ3DBTApWlhToZlBUaa6EE5IxzLWTZQAPziteUCmxkDaAbOjeCNrXkbIecfekO43yF1iTvXrdq8G6l_ZvqtVP_N51bqkX_qrioipLSJHD4LeD7lxFDVCsXDLat7rAfg6KSljUvKlkm9OgLNenb4LH5PUNBfcSiUiyKclVAYg_--volf3Jg70XRiuQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1716942876</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Participation strategies and student performance: An undergraduate health science retrospective study</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Starmer, David J ; Duquette, Sean ; Howard, Loretta</creator><creatorcontrib>Starmer, David J ; Duquette, Sean ; Howard, Loretta</creatorcontrib><description>This research explores participatory evidence-based teaching methods in a health science course to see if a relationship emerged between the level of student participation and course performance, the type of participation and course performance, or the amount of participation and course performance and level of demonstrated learning. Level of student participation was dichotomous (100% or &lt;100%), and differences between groups on a knowledge test were compared using an unpaired t test. Type of participation was also dichotomous (in class or out), and differences in course performance on the knowledge test were compared using the unpaired t test. Amount of participation and course performance and level of demonstrated learning were also tested after the knowledge test was measured using a matrix based upon Bloom's taxonomy. Students who participated 100% of the time scored 6% higher on average than students with less than 100% participation (t[183] = 3.55, p = .0005, d = 0.52). There was no difference between groups when assessing for differences in course performance by type of participation. Students with 100% participation scored higher on the short answer question section of the examination (t[183] = 4.58, p = .0001, d = 0.68), but there was no difference on the multiple choice question part of the examination. Full participation in the course was related to higher examination scores and higher scores on examination questions assessing higher levels in the cognitive domain.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1042-5055</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2374-250X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.7899/JCE-14-20</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26023893</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: the Association of Chiropractic Colleges</publisher><subject>Original</subject><ispartof>The Journal of chiropractic education, 2015-10, Vol.29 (2), p.134-138</ispartof><rights>2015 Association of Chiropractic Colleges 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-d7e4c3c60176d0989378ecdd060e4344a576f0f0b849115ef7900af1bc51f9743</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-d7e4c3c60176d0989378ecdd060e4344a576f0f0b849115ef7900af1bc51f9743</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4582611/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4582611/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26023893$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Starmer, David J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duquette, Sean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Howard, Loretta</creatorcontrib><title>Participation strategies and student performance: An undergraduate health science retrospective study</title><title>The Journal of chiropractic education</title><addtitle>J Chiropr Educ</addtitle><description>This research explores participatory evidence-based teaching methods in a health science course to see if a relationship emerged between the level of student participation and course performance, the type of participation and course performance, or the amount of participation and course performance and level of demonstrated learning. Level of student participation was dichotomous (100% or &lt;100%), and differences between groups on a knowledge test were compared using an unpaired t test. Type of participation was also dichotomous (in class or out), and differences in course performance on the knowledge test were compared using the unpaired t test. Amount of participation and course performance and level of demonstrated learning were also tested after the knowledge test was measured using a matrix based upon Bloom's taxonomy. Students who participated 100% of the time scored 6% higher on average than students with less than 100% participation (t[183] = 3.55, p = .0005, d = 0.52). There was no difference between groups when assessing for differences in course performance by type of participation. Students with 100% participation scored higher on the short answer question section of the examination (t[183] = 4.58, p = .0001, d = 0.68), but there was no difference on the multiple choice question part of the examination. Full participation in the course was related to higher examination scores and higher scores on examination questions assessing higher levels in the cognitive domain.</description><subject>Original</subject><issn>1042-5055</issn><issn>2374-250X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkU1LxDAQhoMoun4c_APSox6qkyZpWg_CsviJoAcFbyGbTHcj3bYmqeC_N36ip5lhHt55h5eQfQrHsqrrk5vZeU55XsAamRRMpk7A0zqZUOBFLkCILbIdwjOAYIKLTbJVlFCwqmYTgvfaR2fcoKPruyxEryMuHIZMdzaNo8UuZgP6pvcr3Rk8zaZdNnYW_cJrOyY6W6Ju4zILxmECMo_R92FAE90rfkq87ZKNRrcB977rDnm8OH-YXeW3d5fXs-ltbhiImFuJ3DBTApWlhToZlBUaa6EE5IxzLWTZQAPziteUCmxkDaAbOjeCNrXkbIecfekO43yF1iTvXrdq8G6l_ZvqtVP_N51bqkX_qrioipLSJHD4LeD7lxFDVCsXDLat7rAfg6KSljUvKlkm9OgLNenb4LH5PUNBfcSiUiyKclVAYg_--volf3Jg70XRiuQ</recordid><startdate>20151001</startdate><enddate>20151001</enddate><creator>Starmer, David J</creator><creator>Duquette, Sean</creator><creator>Howard, Loretta</creator><general>the Association of Chiropractic Colleges</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151001</creationdate><title>Participation strategies and student performance: An undergraduate health science retrospective study</title><author>Starmer, David J ; Duquette, Sean ; Howard, Loretta</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-d7e4c3c60176d0989378ecdd060e4344a576f0f0b849115ef7900af1bc51f9743</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Original</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Starmer, David J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duquette, Sean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Howard, Loretta</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The Journal of chiropractic education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Starmer, David J</au><au>Duquette, Sean</au><au>Howard, Loretta</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Participation strategies and student performance: An undergraduate health science retrospective study</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of chiropractic education</jtitle><addtitle>J Chiropr Educ</addtitle><date>2015-10-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>134</spage><epage>138</epage><pages>134-138</pages><issn>1042-5055</issn><eissn>2374-250X</eissn><abstract>This research explores participatory evidence-based teaching methods in a health science course to see if a relationship emerged between the level of student participation and course performance, the type of participation and course performance, or the amount of participation and course performance and level of demonstrated learning. Level of student participation was dichotomous (100% or &lt;100%), and differences between groups on a knowledge test were compared using an unpaired t test. Type of participation was also dichotomous (in class or out), and differences in course performance on the knowledge test were compared using the unpaired t test. Amount of participation and course performance and level of demonstrated learning were also tested after the knowledge test was measured using a matrix based upon Bloom's taxonomy. Students who participated 100% of the time scored 6% higher on average than students with less than 100% participation (t[183] = 3.55, p = .0005, d = 0.52). There was no difference between groups when assessing for differences in course performance by type of participation. Students with 100% participation scored higher on the short answer question section of the examination (t[183] = 4.58, p = .0001, d = 0.68), but there was no difference on the multiple choice question part of the examination. Full participation in the course was related to higher examination scores and higher scores on examination questions assessing higher levels in the cognitive domain.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>the Association of Chiropractic Colleges</pub><pmid>26023893</pmid><doi>10.7899/JCE-14-20</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1042-5055
ispartof The Journal of chiropractic education, 2015-10, Vol.29 (2), p.134-138
issn 1042-5055
2374-250X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4582611
source EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Original
title Participation strategies and student performance: An undergraduate health science retrospective study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T03%3A45%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Participation%20strategies%20and%20student%20performance:%20An%20undergraduate%20health%20science%20retrospective%20study&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20chiropractic%20education&rft.au=Starmer,%20David%20J&rft.date=2015-10-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=134&rft.epage=138&rft.pages=134-138&rft.issn=1042-5055&rft.eissn=2374-250X&rft_id=info:doi/10.7899/JCE-14-20&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1716942876%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1716942876&rft_id=info:pmid/26023893&rfr_iscdi=true