Cervical Cancer Screening, Pelvic Examinations, and Contraceptive Use Among Adolescent and Young Adult Females
Abstract Purpose The purpose of this study was to characterize the association between pelvic examination and adolescent contraceptive method use in two time periods in the 2006–2010 National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG). Methods Using data from the 2006–2010 NSFG, we used descriptive statistics a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of adolescent health 2015-08, Vol.57 (2), p.169-173 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 173 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 169 |
container_title | Journal of adolescent health |
container_volume | 57 |
creator | Vinekar, Kavita S., M.D Vahratian, Anjel, Ph.D Hall, Kelli S., Ph.D West, Brady T., Ph.D Caldwell, Amy, M.D Bell, Jason D., M.D Dalton, Vanessa K., M.D., M.P.H |
description | Abstract Purpose The purpose of this study was to characterize the association between pelvic examination and adolescent contraceptive method use in two time periods in the 2006–2010 National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG). Methods Using data from the 2006–2010 NSFG, we used descriptive statistics and multivariable regression models to examine the association between pelvic examination and/or Pap smear and use of effective or highly effective contraceptive methods during two time periods (2006–2008 and 2008–2010). We used the design characteristics of the NSFG to produce population estimates. Results More than half (57.3%) of our target population reported that they had a pelvic examination and/or Pap smear in the preceding 12 months. After considering health service use, pregnancy history, and demographic characteristics, receipt of pelvic/Pap remained significantly associated with use of effective or highly effective methods of contraception. Adjusted odds ratio = 1.86; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.17–2.97. When we examined the relationship between pelvic/Pap and use of effective or highly effective methods within time periods, we found that the odds of effective contraception use were higher among adolescents who had received a Pap/pelvic examination in Period 1 (June 2006–May 2008) but not in Period 2 (June 2008–May 2010). Odds ratio = 3.05; 95% CI, 1.53–6.03 and odds ratio = 1.52; 95% CI, .88–2.62, Periods 1 and 2 respectively. Conclusions This finding provides some reassurance that although indications for pelvic examination and Pap smear among adolescents have decreased, the previously documented association between pelvic examination and effective or highly effective contraception appears to have decreased. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2015.04.001 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4580912</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S1054139X15001561</els_id><sourcerecordid>1698956725</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c567t-29e7307d6f0d22d2b9391d1c018b8f2ee1baa2ef37224d33b7c1df264b310bb93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkk1v1DAQhiMEoh_wF5CPHJrgcb4vlZaopUiVQCqV4GQ59mTXi2MvdrJq_z1Ot5SPEydbnnfemfEzSUKAZkCherfNtkK5DQozbTJGocxokVEKz5JjaOo2hbZmz-OdlkUKefv1KDkJYRsFVQX0ZXLEKsqqoq6PE9uh32spDOmElejJjfSIVtv1GfmMJobIxZ0YtRWTdjacEWEV6ZydvJC4m_QeyW1AshqdXZOVcgaDRDs9yL65-eFxNhO5xFHE2KvkxSBMwNeP52lye3nxpbtKrz99-NitrlNZVvWUshbrnNaqGqhiTLG-zVtQICk0fTMwROiFYDjkNWOFyvO-lqCGOFKfA-2j-jQ5P_ju5n5EtbTkheE7r0fh77kTmv8dsXrD127Pi7KhLbBo8PbRwLsfM4aJjzpOZoyw6ObAoWqbNvbKyihtDlLpXQgeh6cyQPmCi2_5b1x8wcVpwSONmPrmzzafEn_xiYL3BwHGz9pr9DxIjRGU0h7lxJXT_1Pl_B8TabRdoH_HewxbN3sbYXDggXHKb5a1WbYGyphdVpD_BEskwnc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1698956725</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cervical Cancer Screening, Pelvic Examinations, and Contraceptive Use Among Adolescent and Young Adult Females</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Vinekar, Kavita S., M.D ; Vahratian, Anjel, Ph.D ; Hall, Kelli S., Ph.D ; West, Brady T., Ph.D ; Caldwell, Amy, M.D ; Bell, Jason D., M.D ; Dalton, Vanessa K., M.D., M.P.H</creator><creatorcontrib>Vinekar, Kavita S., M.D ; Vahratian, Anjel, Ph.D ; Hall, Kelli S., Ph.D ; West, Brady T., Ph.D ; Caldwell, Amy, M.D ; Bell, Jason D., M.D ; Dalton, Vanessa K., M.D., M.P.H</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Purpose The purpose of this study was to characterize the association between pelvic examination and adolescent contraceptive method use in two time periods in the 2006–2010 National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG). Methods Using data from the 2006–2010 NSFG, we used descriptive statistics and multivariable regression models to examine the association between pelvic examination and/or Pap smear and use of effective or highly effective contraceptive methods during two time periods (2006–2008 and 2008–2010). We used the design characteristics of the NSFG to produce population estimates. Results More than half (57.3%) of our target population reported that they had a pelvic examination and/or Pap smear in the preceding 12 months. After considering health service use, pregnancy history, and demographic characteristics, receipt of pelvic/Pap remained significantly associated with use of effective or highly effective methods of contraception. Adjusted odds ratio = 1.86; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.17–2.97. When we examined the relationship between pelvic/Pap and use of effective or highly effective methods within time periods, we found that the odds of effective contraception use were higher among adolescents who had received a Pap/pelvic examination in Period 1 (June 2006–May 2008) but not in Period 2 (June 2008–May 2010). Odds ratio = 3.05; 95% CI, 1.53–6.03 and odds ratio = 1.52; 95% CI, .88–2.62, Periods 1 and 2 respectively. Conclusions This finding provides some reassurance that although indications for pelvic examination and Pap smear among adolescents have decreased, the previously documented association between pelvic examination and effective or highly effective contraception appears to have decreased.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1054-139X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1972</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2015.04.001</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26026477</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject><![CDATA[Adolescent ; Adolescents ; Adult ; Contraception ; Contraception - methods ; Contraception - statistics & numerical data ; Contraception Behavior - statistics & numerical data ; Early Detection of Cancer - methods ; Early Detection of Cancer - statistics & numerical data ; Female ; Gynecological Examination - methods ; Gynecological Examination - statistics & numerical data ; Humans ; Multivariate Analysis ; Odds Ratio ; Papanicolaou Test - methods ; Papanicolaou Test - statistics & numerical data ; Pediatrics ; Pelvic examination ; Pregnancy ; Regression Analysis ; Time Factors ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - prevention & control ; Young Adult]]></subject><ispartof>Journal of adolescent health, 2015-08, Vol.57 (2), p.169-173</ispartof><rights>Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine</rights><rights>2015 Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c567t-29e7307d6f0d22d2b9391d1c018b8f2ee1baa2ef37224d33b7c1df264b310bb93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c567t-29e7307d6f0d22d2b9391d1c018b8f2ee1baa2ef37224d33b7c1df264b310bb93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2015.04.001$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26026477$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vinekar, Kavita S., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vahratian, Anjel, Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hall, Kelli S., Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>West, Brady T., Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caldwell, Amy, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bell, Jason D., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dalton, Vanessa K., M.D., M.P.H</creatorcontrib><title>Cervical Cancer Screening, Pelvic Examinations, and Contraceptive Use Among Adolescent and Young Adult Females</title><title>Journal of adolescent health</title><addtitle>J Adolesc Health</addtitle><description>Abstract Purpose The purpose of this study was to characterize the association between pelvic examination and adolescent contraceptive method use in two time periods in the 2006–2010 National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG). Methods Using data from the 2006–2010 NSFG, we used descriptive statistics and multivariable regression models to examine the association between pelvic examination and/or Pap smear and use of effective or highly effective contraceptive methods during two time periods (2006–2008 and 2008–2010). We used the design characteristics of the NSFG to produce population estimates. Results More than half (57.3%) of our target population reported that they had a pelvic examination and/or Pap smear in the preceding 12 months. After considering health service use, pregnancy history, and demographic characteristics, receipt of pelvic/Pap remained significantly associated with use of effective or highly effective methods of contraception. Adjusted odds ratio = 1.86; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.17–2.97. When we examined the relationship between pelvic/Pap and use of effective or highly effective methods within time periods, we found that the odds of effective contraception use were higher among adolescents who had received a Pap/pelvic examination in Period 1 (June 2006–May 2008) but not in Period 2 (June 2008–May 2010). Odds ratio = 3.05; 95% CI, 1.53–6.03 and odds ratio = 1.52; 95% CI, .88–2.62, Periods 1 and 2 respectively. Conclusions This finding provides some reassurance that although indications for pelvic examination and Pap smear among adolescents have decreased, the previously documented association between pelvic examination and effective or highly effective contraception appears to have decreased.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adolescents</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Contraception</subject><subject>Contraception - methods</subject><subject>Contraception - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Contraception Behavior - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Early Detection of Cancer - methods</subject><subject>Early Detection of Cancer - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gynecological Examination - methods</subject><subject>Gynecological Examination - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Multivariate Analysis</subject><subject>Odds Ratio</subject><subject>Papanicolaou Test - methods</subject><subject>Papanicolaou Test - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Pelvic examination</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Regression Analysis</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - prevention & control</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1054-139X</issn><issn>1879-1972</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkk1v1DAQhiMEoh_wF5CPHJrgcb4vlZaopUiVQCqV4GQ59mTXi2MvdrJq_z1Ot5SPEydbnnfemfEzSUKAZkCherfNtkK5DQozbTJGocxokVEKz5JjaOo2hbZmz-OdlkUKefv1KDkJYRsFVQX0ZXLEKsqqoq6PE9uh32spDOmElejJjfSIVtv1GfmMJobIxZ0YtRWTdjacEWEV6ZydvJC4m_QeyW1AshqdXZOVcgaDRDs9yL65-eFxNhO5xFHE2KvkxSBMwNeP52lye3nxpbtKrz99-NitrlNZVvWUshbrnNaqGqhiTLG-zVtQICk0fTMwROiFYDjkNWOFyvO-lqCGOFKfA-2j-jQ5P_ju5n5EtbTkheE7r0fh77kTmv8dsXrD127Pi7KhLbBo8PbRwLsfM4aJjzpOZoyw6ObAoWqbNvbKyihtDlLpXQgeh6cyQPmCi2_5b1x8wcVpwSONmPrmzzafEn_xiYL3BwHGz9pr9DxIjRGU0h7lxJXT_1Pl_B8TabRdoH_HewxbN3sbYXDggXHKb5a1WbYGyphdVpD_BEskwnc</recordid><startdate>20150801</startdate><enddate>20150801</enddate><creator>Vinekar, Kavita S., M.D</creator><creator>Vahratian, Anjel, Ph.D</creator><creator>Hall, Kelli S., Ph.D</creator><creator>West, Brady T., Ph.D</creator><creator>Caldwell, Amy, M.D</creator><creator>Bell, Jason D., M.D</creator><creator>Dalton, Vanessa K., M.D., M.P.H</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150801</creationdate><title>Cervical Cancer Screening, Pelvic Examinations, and Contraceptive Use Among Adolescent and Young Adult Females</title><author>Vinekar, Kavita S., M.D ; Vahratian, Anjel, Ph.D ; Hall, Kelli S., Ph.D ; West, Brady T., Ph.D ; Caldwell, Amy, M.D ; Bell, Jason D., M.D ; Dalton, Vanessa K., M.D., M.P.H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c567t-29e7307d6f0d22d2b9391d1c018b8f2ee1baa2ef37224d33b7c1df264b310bb93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adolescents</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Contraception</topic><topic>Contraception - methods</topic><topic>Contraception - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Contraception Behavior - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Early Detection of Cancer - methods</topic><topic>Early Detection of Cancer - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gynecological Examination - methods</topic><topic>Gynecological Examination - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Multivariate Analysis</topic><topic>Odds Ratio</topic><topic>Papanicolaou Test - methods</topic><topic>Papanicolaou Test - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Pelvic examination</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Regression Analysis</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - prevention & control</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vinekar, Kavita S., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vahratian, Anjel, Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hall, Kelli S., Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>West, Brady T., Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caldwell, Amy, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bell, Jason D., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dalton, Vanessa K., M.D., M.P.H</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of adolescent health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vinekar, Kavita S., M.D</au><au>Vahratian, Anjel, Ph.D</au><au>Hall, Kelli S., Ph.D</au><au>West, Brady T., Ph.D</au><au>Caldwell, Amy, M.D</au><au>Bell, Jason D., M.D</au><au>Dalton, Vanessa K., M.D., M.P.H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cervical Cancer Screening, Pelvic Examinations, and Contraceptive Use Among Adolescent and Young Adult Females</atitle><jtitle>Journal of adolescent health</jtitle><addtitle>J Adolesc Health</addtitle><date>2015-08-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>169</spage><epage>173</epage><pages>169-173</pages><issn>1054-139X</issn><eissn>1879-1972</eissn><abstract>Abstract Purpose The purpose of this study was to characterize the association between pelvic examination and adolescent contraceptive method use in two time periods in the 2006–2010 National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG). Methods Using data from the 2006–2010 NSFG, we used descriptive statistics and multivariable regression models to examine the association between pelvic examination and/or Pap smear and use of effective or highly effective contraceptive methods during two time periods (2006–2008 and 2008–2010). We used the design characteristics of the NSFG to produce population estimates. Results More than half (57.3%) of our target population reported that they had a pelvic examination and/or Pap smear in the preceding 12 months. After considering health service use, pregnancy history, and demographic characteristics, receipt of pelvic/Pap remained significantly associated with use of effective or highly effective methods of contraception. Adjusted odds ratio = 1.86; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.17–2.97. When we examined the relationship between pelvic/Pap and use of effective or highly effective methods within time periods, we found that the odds of effective contraception use were higher among adolescents who had received a Pap/pelvic examination in Period 1 (June 2006–May 2008) but not in Period 2 (June 2008–May 2010). Odds ratio = 3.05; 95% CI, 1.53–6.03 and odds ratio = 1.52; 95% CI, .88–2.62, Periods 1 and 2 respectively. Conclusions This finding provides some reassurance that although indications for pelvic examination and Pap smear among adolescents have decreased, the previously documented association between pelvic examination and effective or highly effective contraception appears to have decreased.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>26026477</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jadohealth.2015.04.001</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1054-139X |
ispartof | Journal of adolescent health, 2015-08, Vol.57 (2), p.169-173 |
issn | 1054-139X 1879-1972 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4580912 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Adolescent Adolescents Adult Contraception Contraception - methods Contraception - statistics & numerical data Contraception Behavior - statistics & numerical data Early Detection of Cancer - methods Early Detection of Cancer - statistics & numerical data Female Gynecological Examination - methods Gynecological Examination - statistics & numerical data Humans Multivariate Analysis Odds Ratio Papanicolaou Test - methods Papanicolaou Test - statistics & numerical data Pediatrics Pelvic examination Pregnancy Regression Analysis Time Factors Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - diagnosis Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - prevention & control Young Adult |
title | Cervical Cancer Screening, Pelvic Examinations, and Contraceptive Use Among Adolescent and Young Adult Females |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T01%3A00%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cervical%20Cancer%20Screening,%20Pelvic%20Examinations,%20and%20Contraceptive%20Use%20Among%20Adolescent%20and%20Young%20Adult%20Females&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20adolescent%20health&rft.au=Vinekar,%20Kavita%20S.,%20M.D&rft.date=2015-08-01&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=169&rft.epage=173&rft.pages=169-173&rft.issn=1054-139X&rft.eissn=1879-1972&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2015.04.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1698956725%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1698956725&rft_id=info:pmid/26026477&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S1054139X15001561&rfr_iscdi=true |