Cervical Cancer Screening, Pelvic Examinations, and Contraceptive Use Among Adolescent and Young Adult Females

Abstract Purpose The purpose of this study was to characterize the association between pelvic examination and adolescent contraceptive method use in two time periods in the 2006–2010 National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG). Methods Using data from the 2006–2010 NSFG, we used descriptive statistics a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of adolescent health 2015-08, Vol.57 (2), p.169-173
Hauptverfasser: Vinekar, Kavita S., M.D, Vahratian, Anjel, Ph.D, Hall, Kelli S., Ph.D, West, Brady T., Ph.D, Caldwell, Amy, M.D, Bell, Jason D., M.D, Dalton, Vanessa K., M.D., M.P.H
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 173
container_issue 2
container_start_page 169
container_title Journal of adolescent health
container_volume 57
creator Vinekar, Kavita S., M.D
Vahratian, Anjel, Ph.D
Hall, Kelli S., Ph.D
West, Brady T., Ph.D
Caldwell, Amy, M.D
Bell, Jason D., M.D
Dalton, Vanessa K., M.D., M.P.H
description Abstract Purpose The purpose of this study was to characterize the association between pelvic examination and adolescent contraceptive method use in two time periods in the 2006–2010 National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG). Methods Using data from the 2006–2010 NSFG, we used descriptive statistics and multivariable regression models to examine the association between pelvic examination and/or Pap smear and use of effective or highly effective contraceptive methods during two time periods (2006–2008 and 2008–2010). We used the design characteristics of the NSFG to produce population estimates. Results More than half (57.3%) of our target population reported that they had a pelvic examination and/or Pap smear in the preceding 12 months. After considering health service use, pregnancy history, and demographic characteristics, receipt of pelvic/Pap remained significantly associated with use of effective or highly effective methods of contraception. Adjusted odds ratio = 1.86; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.17–2.97. When we examined the relationship between pelvic/Pap and use of effective or highly effective methods within time periods, we found that the odds of effective contraception use were higher among adolescents who had received a Pap/pelvic examination in Period 1 (June 2006–May 2008) but not in Period 2 (June 2008–May 2010). Odds ratio = 3.05; 95% CI, 1.53–6.03 and odds ratio = 1.52; 95% CI, .88–2.62, Periods 1 and 2 respectively. Conclusions This finding provides some reassurance that although indications for pelvic examination and Pap smear among adolescents have decreased, the previously documented association between pelvic examination and effective or highly effective contraception appears to have decreased.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2015.04.001
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4580912</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S1054139X15001561</els_id><sourcerecordid>1698956725</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c567t-29e7307d6f0d22d2b9391d1c018b8f2ee1baa2ef37224d33b7c1df264b310bb93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkk1v1DAQhiMEoh_wF5CPHJrgcb4vlZaopUiVQCqV4GQ59mTXi2MvdrJq_z1Ot5SPEydbnnfemfEzSUKAZkCherfNtkK5DQozbTJGocxokVEKz5JjaOo2hbZmz-OdlkUKefv1KDkJYRsFVQX0ZXLEKsqqoq6PE9uh32spDOmElejJjfSIVtv1GfmMJobIxZ0YtRWTdjacEWEV6ZydvJC4m_QeyW1AshqdXZOVcgaDRDs9yL65-eFxNhO5xFHE2KvkxSBMwNeP52lye3nxpbtKrz99-NitrlNZVvWUshbrnNaqGqhiTLG-zVtQICk0fTMwROiFYDjkNWOFyvO-lqCGOFKfA-2j-jQ5P_ju5n5EtbTkheE7r0fh77kTmv8dsXrD127Pi7KhLbBo8PbRwLsfM4aJjzpOZoyw6ObAoWqbNvbKyihtDlLpXQgeh6cyQPmCi2_5b1x8wcVpwSONmPrmzzafEn_xiYL3BwHGz9pr9DxIjRGU0h7lxJXT_1Pl_B8TabRdoH_HewxbN3sbYXDggXHKb5a1WbYGyphdVpD_BEskwnc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1698956725</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cervical Cancer Screening, Pelvic Examinations, and Contraceptive Use Among Adolescent and Young Adult Females</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Vinekar, Kavita S., M.D ; Vahratian, Anjel, Ph.D ; Hall, Kelli S., Ph.D ; West, Brady T., Ph.D ; Caldwell, Amy, M.D ; Bell, Jason D., M.D ; Dalton, Vanessa K., M.D., M.P.H</creator><creatorcontrib>Vinekar, Kavita S., M.D ; Vahratian, Anjel, Ph.D ; Hall, Kelli S., Ph.D ; West, Brady T., Ph.D ; Caldwell, Amy, M.D ; Bell, Jason D., M.D ; Dalton, Vanessa K., M.D., M.P.H</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Purpose The purpose of this study was to characterize the association between pelvic examination and adolescent contraceptive method use in two time periods in the 2006–2010 National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG). Methods Using data from the 2006–2010 NSFG, we used descriptive statistics and multivariable regression models to examine the association between pelvic examination and/or Pap smear and use of effective or highly effective contraceptive methods during two time periods (2006–2008 and 2008–2010). We used the design characteristics of the NSFG to produce population estimates. Results More than half (57.3%) of our target population reported that they had a pelvic examination and/or Pap smear in the preceding 12 months. After considering health service use, pregnancy history, and demographic characteristics, receipt of pelvic/Pap remained significantly associated with use of effective or highly effective methods of contraception. Adjusted odds ratio = 1.86; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.17–2.97. When we examined the relationship between pelvic/Pap and use of effective or highly effective methods within time periods, we found that the odds of effective contraception use were higher among adolescents who had received a Pap/pelvic examination in Period 1 (June 2006–May 2008) but not in Period 2 (June 2008–May 2010). Odds ratio = 3.05; 95% CI, 1.53–6.03 and odds ratio = 1.52; 95% CI, .88–2.62, Periods 1 and 2 respectively. Conclusions This finding provides some reassurance that although indications for pelvic examination and Pap smear among adolescents have decreased, the previously documented association between pelvic examination and effective or highly effective contraception appears to have decreased.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1054-139X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1972</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2015.04.001</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26026477</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject><![CDATA[Adolescent ; Adolescents ; Adult ; Contraception ; Contraception - methods ; Contraception - statistics & numerical data ; Contraception Behavior - statistics & numerical data ; Early Detection of Cancer - methods ; Early Detection of Cancer - statistics & numerical data ; Female ; Gynecological Examination - methods ; Gynecological Examination - statistics & numerical data ; Humans ; Multivariate Analysis ; Odds Ratio ; Papanicolaou Test - methods ; Papanicolaou Test - statistics & numerical data ; Pediatrics ; Pelvic examination ; Pregnancy ; Regression Analysis ; Time Factors ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - prevention & control ; Young Adult]]></subject><ispartof>Journal of adolescent health, 2015-08, Vol.57 (2), p.169-173</ispartof><rights>Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine</rights><rights>2015 Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c567t-29e7307d6f0d22d2b9391d1c018b8f2ee1baa2ef37224d33b7c1df264b310bb93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c567t-29e7307d6f0d22d2b9391d1c018b8f2ee1baa2ef37224d33b7c1df264b310bb93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2015.04.001$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26026477$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vinekar, Kavita S., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vahratian, Anjel, Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hall, Kelli S., Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>West, Brady T., Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caldwell, Amy, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bell, Jason D., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dalton, Vanessa K., M.D., M.P.H</creatorcontrib><title>Cervical Cancer Screening, Pelvic Examinations, and Contraceptive Use Among Adolescent and Young Adult Females</title><title>Journal of adolescent health</title><addtitle>J Adolesc Health</addtitle><description>Abstract Purpose The purpose of this study was to characterize the association between pelvic examination and adolescent contraceptive method use in two time periods in the 2006–2010 National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG). Methods Using data from the 2006–2010 NSFG, we used descriptive statistics and multivariable regression models to examine the association between pelvic examination and/or Pap smear and use of effective or highly effective contraceptive methods during two time periods (2006–2008 and 2008–2010). We used the design characteristics of the NSFG to produce population estimates. Results More than half (57.3%) of our target population reported that they had a pelvic examination and/or Pap smear in the preceding 12 months. After considering health service use, pregnancy history, and demographic characteristics, receipt of pelvic/Pap remained significantly associated with use of effective or highly effective methods of contraception. Adjusted odds ratio = 1.86; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.17–2.97. When we examined the relationship between pelvic/Pap and use of effective or highly effective methods within time periods, we found that the odds of effective contraception use were higher among adolescents who had received a Pap/pelvic examination in Period 1 (June 2006–May 2008) but not in Period 2 (June 2008–May 2010). Odds ratio = 3.05; 95% CI, 1.53–6.03 and odds ratio = 1.52; 95% CI, .88–2.62, Periods 1 and 2 respectively. Conclusions This finding provides some reassurance that although indications for pelvic examination and Pap smear among adolescents have decreased, the previously documented association between pelvic examination and effective or highly effective contraception appears to have decreased.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adolescents</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Contraception</subject><subject>Contraception - methods</subject><subject>Contraception - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Contraception Behavior - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Early Detection of Cancer - methods</subject><subject>Early Detection of Cancer - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gynecological Examination - methods</subject><subject>Gynecological Examination - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Multivariate Analysis</subject><subject>Odds Ratio</subject><subject>Papanicolaou Test - methods</subject><subject>Papanicolaou Test - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Pelvic examination</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Regression Analysis</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1054-139X</issn><issn>1879-1972</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkk1v1DAQhiMEoh_wF5CPHJrgcb4vlZaopUiVQCqV4GQ59mTXi2MvdrJq_z1Ot5SPEydbnnfemfEzSUKAZkCherfNtkK5DQozbTJGocxokVEKz5JjaOo2hbZmz-OdlkUKefv1KDkJYRsFVQX0ZXLEKsqqoq6PE9uh32spDOmElejJjfSIVtv1GfmMJobIxZ0YtRWTdjacEWEV6ZydvJC4m_QeyW1AshqdXZOVcgaDRDs9yL65-eFxNhO5xFHE2KvkxSBMwNeP52lye3nxpbtKrz99-NitrlNZVvWUshbrnNaqGqhiTLG-zVtQICk0fTMwROiFYDjkNWOFyvO-lqCGOFKfA-2j-jQ5P_ju5n5EtbTkheE7r0fh77kTmv8dsXrD127Pi7KhLbBo8PbRwLsfM4aJjzpOZoyw6ObAoWqbNvbKyihtDlLpXQgeh6cyQPmCi2_5b1x8wcVpwSONmPrmzzafEn_xiYL3BwHGz9pr9DxIjRGU0h7lxJXT_1Pl_B8TabRdoH_HewxbN3sbYXDggXHKb5a1WbYGyphdVpD_BEskwnc</recordid><startdate>20150801</startdate><enddate>20150801</enddate><creator>Vinekar, Kavita S., M.D</creator><creator>Vahratian, Anjel, Ph.D</creator><creator>Hall, Kelli S., Ph.D</creator><creator>West, Brady T., Ph.D</creator><creator>Caldwell, Amy, M.D</creator><creator>Bell, Jason D., M.D</creator><creator>Dalton, Vanessa K., M.D., M.P.H</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150801</creationdate><title>Cervical Cancer Screening, Pelvic Examinations, and Contraceptive Use Among Adolescent and Young Adult Females</title><author>Vinekar, Kavita S., M.D ; Vahratian, Anjel, Ph.D ; Hall, Kelli S., Ph.D ; West, Brady T., Ph.D ; Caldwell, Amy, M.D ; Bell, Jason D., M.D ; Dalton, Vanessa K., M.D., M.P.H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c567t-29e7307d6f0d22d2b9391d1c018b8f2ee1baa2ef37224d33b7c1df264b310bb93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adolescents</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Contraception</topic><topic>Contraception - methods</topic><topic>Contraception - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Contraception Behavior - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Early Detection of Cancer - methods</topic><topic>Early Detection of Cancer - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gynecological Examination - methods</topic><topic>Gynecological Examination - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Multivariate Analysis</topic><topic>Odds Ratio</topic><topic>Papanicolaou Test - methods</topic><topic>Papanicolaou Test - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Pelvic examination</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Regression Analysis</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vinekar, Kavita S., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vahratian, Anjel, Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hall, Kelli S., Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>West, Brady T., Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caldwell, Amy, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bell, Jason D., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dalton, Vanessa K., M.D., M.P.H</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of adolescent health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vinekar, Kavita S., M.D</au><au>Vahratian, Anjel, Ph.D</au><au>Hall, Kelli S., Ph.D</au><au>West, Brady T., Ph.D</au><au>Caldwell, Amy, M.D</au><au>Bell, Jason D., M.D</au><au>Dalton, Vanessa K., M.D., M.P.H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cervical Cancer Screening, Pelvic Examinations, and Contraceptive Use Among Adolescent and Young Adult Females</atitle><jtitle>Journal of adolescent health</jtitle><addtitle>J Adolesc Health</addtitle><date>2015-08-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>169</spage><epage>173</epage><pages>169-173</pages><issn>1054-139X</issn><eissn>1879-1972</eissn><abstract>Abstract Purpose The purpose of this study was to characterize the association between pelvic examination and adolescent contraceptive method use in two time periods in the 2006–2010 National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG). Methods Using data from the 2006–2010 NSFG, we used descriptive statistics and multivariable regression models to examine the association between pelvic examination and/or Pap smear and use of effective or highly effective contraceptive methods during two time periods (2006–2008 and 2008–2010). We used the design characteristics of the NSFG to produce population estimates. Results More than half (57.3%) of our target population reported that they had a pelvic examination and/or Pap smear in the preceding 12 months. After considering health service use, pregnancy history, and demographic characteristics, receipt of pelvic/Pap remained significantly associated with use of effective or highly effective methods of contraception. Adjusted odds ratio = 1.86; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.17–2.97. When we examined the relationship between pelvic/Pap and use of effective or highly effective methods within time periods, we found that the odds of effective contraception use were higher among adolescents who had received a Pap/pelvic examination in Period 1 (June 2006–May 2008) but not in Period 2 (June 2008–May 2010). Odds ratio = 3.05; 95% CI, 1.53–6.03 and odds ratio = 1.52; 95% CI, .88–2.62, Periods 1 and 2 respectively. Conclusions This finding provides some reassurance that although indications for pelvic examination and Pap smear among adolescents have decreased, the previously documented association between pelvic examination and effective or highly effective contraception appears to have decreased.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>26026477</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jadohealth.2015.04.001</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1054-139X
ispartof Journal of adolescent health, 2015-08, Vol.57 (2), p.169-173
issn 1054-139X
1879-1972
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4580912
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Adolescent
Adolescents
Adult
Contraception
Contraception - methods
Contraception - statistics & numerical data
Contraception Behavior - statistics & numerical data
Early Detection of Cancer - methods
Early Detection of Cancer - statistics & numerical data
Female
Gynecological Examination - methods
Gynecological Examination - statistics & numerical data
Humans
Multivariate Analysis
Odds Ratio
Papanicolaou Test - methods
Papanicolaou Test - statistics & numerical data
Pediatrics
Pelvic examination
Pregnancy
Regression Analysis
Time Factors
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - diagnosis
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - prevention & control
Young Adult
title Cervical Cancer Screening, Pelvic Examinations, and Contraceptive Use Among Adolescent and Young Adult Females
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T01%3A00%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cervical%20Cancer%20Screening,%20Pelvic%20Examinations,%20and%20Contraceptive%20Use%20Among%20Adolescent%20and%20Young%20Adult%20Females&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20adolescent%20health&rft.au=Vinekar,%20Kavita%20S.,%20M.D&rft.date=2015-08-01&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=169&rft.epage=173&rft.pages=169-173&rft.issn=1054-139X&rft.eissn=1879-1972&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2015.04.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1698956725%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1698956725&rft_id=info:pmid/26026477&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S1054139X15001561&rfr_iscdi=true