Cervical Cancer Screening, Pelvic Examinations, and Contraceptive Use Among Adolescent and Young Adult Females

Abstract Purpose The purpose of this study was to characterize the association between pelvic examination and adolescent contraceptive method use in two time periods in the 2006–2010 National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG). Methods Using data from the 2006–2010 NSFG, we used descriptive statistics a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of adolescent health 2015-08, Vol.57 (2), p.169-173
Hauptverfasser: Vinekar, Kavita S., M.D, Vahratian, Anjel, Ph.D, Hall, Kelli S., Ph.D, West, Brady T., Ph.D, Caldwell, Amy, M.D, Bell, Jason D., M.D, Dalton, Vanessa K., M.D., M.P.H
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Purpose The purpose of this study was to characterize the association between pelvic examination and adolescent contraceptive method use in two time periods in the 2006–2010 National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG). Methods Using data from the 2006–2010 NSFG, we used descriptive statistics and multivariable regression models to examine the association between pelvic examination and/or Pap smear and use of effective or highly effective contraceptive methods during two time periods (2006–2008 and 2008–2010). We used the design characteristics of the NSFG to produce population estimates. Results More than half (57.3%) of our target population reported that they had a pelvic examination and/or Pap smear in the preceding 12 months. After considering health service use, pregnancy history, and demographic characteristics, receipt of pelvic/Pap remained significantly associated with use of effective or highly effective methods of contraception. Adjusted odds ratio = 1.86; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.17–2.97. When we examined the relationship between pelvic/Pap and use of effective or highly effective methods within time periods, we found that the odds of effective contraception use were higher among adolescents who had received a Pap/pelvic examination in Period 1 (June 2006–May 2008) but not in Period 2 (June 2008–May 2010). Odds ratio = 3.05; 95% CI, 1.53–6.03 and odds ratio = 1.52; 95% CI, .88–2.62, Periods 1 and 2 respectively. Conclusions This finding provides some reassurance that although indications for pelvic examination and Pap smear among adolescents have decreased, the previously documented association between pelvic examination and effective or highly effective contraception appears to have decreased.
ISSN:1054-139X
1879-1972
DOI:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2015.04.001