The Effect of Transitions in Caregiving Status and Intensity on Perceived Stress Among 992 Female Caregivers and Noncaregivers

Informal caregiving, a chronic stressor, is also a dynamic experience, as caregivers may repeatedly enter and exit the role and alter the amount of care they provide. Changes in caregiving status and intensity influence stress, but few studies have evaluated the simultaneous impact of these changes...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences Biological sciences and medical sciences, 2015-08, Vol.70 (8), p.1018-1023
Hauptverfasser: Lyons, Jennifer G, Cauley, Jane A, Fredman, Lisa
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Informal caregiving, a chronic stressor, is also a dynamic experience, as caregivers may repeatedly enter and exit the role and alter the amount of care they provide. Changes in caregiving status and intensity influence stress, but few studies have evaluated the simultaneous impact of these changes on perceived stress. A total of 1,027 female caregivers and noncaregivers (mean age = 81.7), of which 992 were included in the final sample, were followed for at least two consecutive annual interviews (ie, one interval) and up to five interviews over a 9-year period. Caregiving status was measured by self-report of whether the respondent assisted someone with at least one basic or instrumental activity of daily living; caregiving intensity was dichotomized at the median number of basic or instrumental activity of daily living tasks caregivers performed. The associations between changes in caregiving status and intensity level with Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) score at the end of an interval were estimated using mixed-effects regression models. Respondents contributed 2,832 intervals. High-intensity caregivers reported the highest stress at the end of an interval, whereas noncaregivers reported the lowest (mean PSS = 18.97 vs 15.73, p < .01). Low-intensity caregivers, whose intensity increased, had higher stress than continuing high-intensity caregivers. Those who stopped caregiving, regardless of intensity level, reported the same amount of stress as noncaregivers. Transitions in caregiving status and intensity affect caregiver perceived stress. Continuing high-intensity caregivers and those who transition from low- to high-intensity caregiving report the highest stress of all transition groups, suggesting that stress-reduction interventions should target high-intensity caregivers.
ISSN:1079-5006
1758-535X
DOI:10.1093/gerona/glv001