Lipid emulsion mitigates local anesthesia-induced central nervous system toxicity in rats
The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of intravenously administered lipid emulsion on local anesthetic (LA)-induced central nervous system (CNS) toxicity. A total of 100 male Sprague Dawley rats were allocated at random into the following groups: Sham (A), lidocaine (B), levobup...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Experimental and therapeutic medicine 2015-09, Vol.10 (3), p.1133-1138 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of intravenously administered lipid emulsion on local anesthetic (LA)-induced central nervous system (CNS) toxicity. A total of 100 male Sprague Dawley rats were allocated at random into the following groups: Sham (A), lidocaine (B), levobupivacaine (C) and ropivacaine (D). Groups B-D were each subdivided into three subgroups: Toxic, post-conditioning and pre-conditioning. Intracerebroventricular injections of 0.9% normal saline (sham group) or LA were administered via microsyringe; in addition, a 20% lipid emulsion was injected into tail vein prior to the LA injection (pre-conditioning subgroups) or following rat respiratory arrest (post-conditioning subgroups). The heart rate, blood pressure, neurological behavior scores, neuronal density and time from LA injection to respiratory arrest, apnea and start of arrhythmia were measured. Rats in the toxic groups died due to respiratory arrest following the injection of LA into the lateral ventricle. Rats in the post-conditioning subgroups were resuscitated from the LA-induced respiratory arrest, while the pre-conditioning subgroup rats exhibited no respiratory arrest. No significant differences in heart rate were observed between the toxic and post-conditioning subgroups in the levobupivacaine and ropivacaine groups (P>0.05); however, a significant difference was observed between these treatment groups and the rats treated with lidocaine (P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1792-0981 1792-1015 |
DOI: | 10.3892/etm.2015.2594 |