Quantum Monte Carlo study of the phase diagram of solid molecular hydrogen at extreme pressures

Establishing the phase diagram of hydrogen is a major challenge for experimental and theoretical physics. Experiment alone cannot establish the atomic structure of solid hydrogen at high pressure, because hydrogen scatters X-rays only weakly. Instead, our understanding of the atomic structure is lar...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Nature communications 2015-07, Vol.6 (1), p.7794-7794, Article 7794
Hauptverfasser: Drummond, N. D., Monserrat, Bartomeu, Lloyd-Williams, Jonathan H., Ríos, P. López, Pickard, Chris J., Needs, R. J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Establishing the phase diagram of hydrogen is a major challenge for experimental and theoretical physics. Experiment alone cannot establish the atomic structure of solid hydrogen at high pressure, because hydrogen scatters X-rays only weakly. Instead, our understanding of the atomic structure is largely based on density functional theory (DFT). By comparing Raman spectra for low-energy structures found in DFT searches with experimental spectra, candidate atomic structures have been identified for each experimentally observed phase. Unfortunately, DFT predicts a metallic structure to be energetically favoured at a broad range of pressures up to 400 GPa, where it is known experimentally that hydrogen is non-metallic. Here we show that more advanced theoretical methods (diffusion quantum Monte Carlo calculations) find the metallic structure to be uncompetitive, and predict a phase diagram in reasonable agreement with experiment. This greatly strengthens the claim that the candidate atomic structures accurately model the experimentally observed phases. Experimental studies of hydrogen at high pressure are challenging, so theory is central to understanding its phase behaviour; however, computed phase diagrams do not agree with previous measurements. Here, the authors use a quantum Monte Carlo method and present results in qualitative agreement with experiment.
ISSN:2041-1723
2041-1723
DOI:10.1038/ncomms8794