Clinical utility of the IHC4+C score in oestrogen receptor-positive early breast cancer: a prospective decision impact study

Background: Most oestrogen receptor (ER)-positive early breast cancer diagnosed today is highly curable with multimodality treatment. Systemic adjuvant treatments including endocrine therapy and chemotherapy have made a significant contribution to the increasing cure rates over the past three decade...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of cancer 2015-07, Vol.113 (3), p.390-395
Hauptverfasser: Yeo, B, Zabaglo, L, Hills, M, Dodson, A, Smith, I, Dowsett, M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background: Most oestrogen receptor (ER)-positive early breast cancer diagnosed today is highly curable with multimodality treatment. Systemic adjuvant treatments including endocrine therapy and chemotherapy have made a significant contribution to the increasing cure rates over the past three decades. However not all women will require chemotherapy. The IHC4+C score is a prognostic tool that integrates four immunohistochemical measures with clinicopathological features to estimate the residual risk of distant recurrence at 10 years in post-menopausal women with ER-positive breast cancer who have received 5 years of endocrine therapy. Retrospective studies indicate that the test can identify a set of women that are at such low risk of recurrence that chemotherapy can be of little benefit. Methods: In this study, 124 patients were prospectively selected from the multidisciplinary team meeting between January 2013 and April 2014 for IHC4+C testing. Adjuvant systemic treatment recommendations by clinicians were recorded without and with the availability of the score in addition to the patient’s decision. Results: There was concordance in the MDT’s recommendation without and with the availability of the score in 73% of cases. Clinicians recommended chemotherapy or at least its discussion to 74 (59%) patients, which fell to 32 (34%) patients after the IHC4+C score was made available, sparing one in four tested patients a chemotherapy recommendation, along with its toxicity and expense. Conclusion: This decision impact study shows that when used by clinicians in the multidisciplinary team meeting for adjuvant decision-making, a significant proportion of patients are spared chemotherapy recommendations.
ISSN:0007-0920
1532-1827
DOI:10.1038/bjc.2015.222