The Validity of Self-Reported Medication Adherence as an Outcome in Clinical Trials of Adherence-Promotion Interventions: Findings from the MACH14 Study

In medication adherence-promotion trials, participants in the intervention arm are often cognizant of the researcher’s aim to improve adherence; this may lead to their inflating reports of their own adherence compared to control arm participants. Using data from 1,247 HIV-positive participants acros...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:AIDS and behavior 2014-12, Vol.18 (12), p.2285-2290
Hauptverfasser: Simoni, Jane M., Huh, David, Wang, Yan, Wilson, Ira B., Reynolds, Nancy R., Remien, Robert H., Goggin, Kathy, Gross, Robert, Rosen, Marc I., Schneiderman, Neil, Arnsten, Julia, Golin, Carol E., Erlen, Judith A., Bangsberg, David R., Liu, Honghu
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In medication adherence-promotion trials, participants in the intervention arm are often cognizant of the researcher’s aim to improve adherence; this may lead to their inflating reports of their own adherence compared to control arm participants. Using data from 1,247 HIV-positive participants across eight U.S. Studies in the Multi-site Adherence Collaboration on HIV (MACH14) collaboration, we evaluated the validity of self-reported adherence by examining whether its association with two more objective outcomes [ 1 ], electronically monitored adherence and [ 2 ] viral load, varied by study arm. After adjusting for potential confounders, there was no evidence of greater overestimation of self-reported adherence among intervention arm participants, supporting its potential as a trial outcome indicator.
ISSN:1090-7165
1573-3254
DOI:10.1007/s10461-014-0905-x