Pseudoprogression in patients with glioblastoma: clinical relevance despite low incidence

According to the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology criteria, new enhancement within the radiation field on contrast enhanced T1-weighted images within 12 weeks after completion of radiotherapy should not qualify for progressive disease, since up to 50% of these cases may be pseudoprogression (Ps...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Neuro-oncology (Charlottesville, Va.) Va.), 2015-01, Vol.17 (1), p.151-159
Hauptverfasser: Radbruch, Alexander, Fladt, Joachim, Kickingereder, Philipp, Wiestler, Benedikt, Nowosielski, Martha, Bäumer, Philipp, Schlemmer, Heinz-Peter, Wick, Antje, Heiland, Sabine, Wick, Wolfgang, Bendszus, Martin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:According to the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology criteria, new enhancement within the radiation field on contrast enhanced T1-weighted images within 12 weeks after completion of radiotherapy should not qualify for progressive disease, since up to 50% of these cases may be pseudoprogression (PsP). To validate this concept, we assessed incidence and overall survival (OS) of patients with suspected and confirmed PsP dependent on different time intervals and definitions of PsP. Patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma and an enhancement increase of at least 25% after completion of standard radiochemotherapy at month 1, 4, 7, or 10 were eligible. Based on the development of the enhancement in follow-up examinations, patients were categorized as either PsP (subgrouped as complete resolution/decrease >50% and decrease 50% in 3, decrease
ISSN:1522-8517
1523-5866
DOI:10.1093/neuonc/nou129