Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of frontal cortex decreases performance on the WAIS-IV intelligence test

•Anodal tDCS over DLPFC reduced performance on the WAIS-IV.•Reduced practice gains were found for right, left, and bilateral tDCS over DLPFC.•Impairment was specific to perceptual reasoning. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) modulates excitability of motor cortex. However, there is conf...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Behavioural brain research 2015-09, Vol.290, p.32-44
Hauptverfasser: Sellers, Kristin K., Mellin, Juliann M., Lustenberger, Caroline M., Boyle, Michael R., Lee, Won Hee, Peterchev, Angel V., Fröhlich, Flavio
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Anodal tDCS over DLPFC reduced performance on the WAIS-IV.•Reduced practice gains were found for right, left, and bilateral tDCS over DLPFC.•Impairment was specific to perceptual reasoning. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) modulates excitability of motor cortex. However, there is conflicting evidence about the efficacy of this non-invasive brain stimulation modality to modulate performance on cognitive tasks. Previous work has tested the effect of tDCS on specific facets of cognition and executive processing. However, no randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study has looked at the effects of tDCS on a comprehensive battery of cognitive processes. The objective of this study was to test if tDCS had an effect on performance on a comprehensive assay of cognitive processes, a standardized intelligence quotient (IQ) test. The study consisted of two substudies and followed a double-blind, between-subjects, sham-controlled design. In total, 41 healthy adult participants were included in the final analysis. These participants completed the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, Fourth Edition (WAIS-IV) as a baseline measure. At least one week later, participants in substudy 1 received either bilateral tDCS (anodes over both F4 and F3, cathode over Cz, 2mA at each anode for 20min) or active sham tDCS (2mA for 40s), and participants in substudy 2 received either right or left tDCS (anode over either F4 or F3, cathode over Cz, 2mA for 20min). In both studies, the WAIS-IV was immediately administered following stimulation to assess for performance differences induced by bilateral and unilateral tDCS. Compared to sham stimulation, right, left, and bilateral tDCS reduced improvement between sessions on Full Scale IQ and the Perceptual Reasoning Index. This demonstration that frontal tDCS selectively degraded improvement on specific metrics of the WAIS-IV raises important questions about the often proposed role of tDCS in cognitive enhancement.
ISSN:0166-4328
1872-7549
DOI:10.1016/j.bbr.2015.04.031