Lexical mediation of phonotactic frequency effects on spoken word recognition: A Granger causality analysis of MRI-constrained MEG/EEG data

•We tracked brain activity during auditory LD manipulating phonotactic frequency.•We measured effective (directed) connectivity between brain regions.•Low frequency items had stronger feedforward mapping from speech to word areas.•High frequency items produced stronger top-down mapping from word to...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of memory and language 2015-07, Vol.82, p.41-55
Hauptverfasser: Gow, David W., Olson, Bruna B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•We tracked brain activity during auditory LD manipulating phonotactic frequency.•We measured effective (directed) connectivity between brain regions.•Low frequency items had stronger feedforward mapping from speech to word areas.•High frequency items produced stronger top-down mapping from word to speech areas. Phonotactic frequency effects play a crucial role in a number of debates over language processing and representation. It is unclear however, whether these effects reflect prelexical sensitivity to phonotactic frequency, or lexical “gang effects” in speech perception. In this paper, we use Granger causality analysis of MR-constrained MEG/EEG data to understand how phonotactic frequency influences neural processing dynamics during auditory lexical decision. Effective connectivity analysis showed weaker feedforward influence from brain regions involved in acoustic–phonetic processing (superior temporal gyrus) to lexical areas (supramarginal gyrus) for high phonotactic frequency words, but stronger top-down lexical influence for the same items. Low entropy nonwords (nonwords judged to closely resemble real words) showed a similar pattern of interactions between brain regions involved in lexical and acoustic–phonetic processing. These results contradict the predictions of a feedforward model of phonotactic frequency facilitation, but support the predictions of a lexically mediated account.
ISSN:0749-596X
1096-0821
DOI:10.1016/j.jml.2015.03.004