A multilevel approach to examining time-specific effects in accelerometer-assessed physical activity

Abstract Objectives Popular methods for analyzing accelerometer data often use a single physical activity outcome variable such as average-weekly or total physical activity. These approaches limit the types of research questions that can be answered and fail to utilize the detailed, time-specific in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of science and medicine in sport 2015-11, Vol.18 (6), p.667-672
Hauptverfasser: Lawman, Hannah G, Horn, M. Lee Van, Wilson, Dawn K, Pate, Russell R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Objectives Popular methods for analyzing accelerometer data often use a single physical activity outcome variable such as average-weekly or total physical activity. These approaches limit the types of research questions that can be answered and fail to utilize the detailed, time-specific information available from accelerometers. This study proposes the use of multilevel modeling, which tested intervention effects at specific time periods. Design The motivating example was the Active by Choice Today trial. Simulations were used to test whether the application of time-specific hypotheses about when physical activity intervention treatment effects were expected to occur (e.g., after-school hours) increased power to detect effects compared to traditional methods. Methods Six simulation conditions were tested: (1) no treatment effects (to test the type 1 error rate), (2) time-specific effects, but no traditionally-tested effects, (3) traditionally-tested effects, but no time-specific effects, and (4) combinations of traditional and time-specific effects in 3 proportions. Results Results showed the proposed multilevel approach demonstrated appropriate type 1 error rates and increased power to detect treatment effects during hypothesized times by 31–38 percentage points compared to traditional approaches. This was consistent across varying proportions of traditional versus time-specific effects, and there was no loss of power using the multilevel approach when only traditional effects were present. Conclusions The current study showed potential advantages of testing time-specific hypotheses about intervention effects using a multilevel time-specific approach. This approach may show intervention effects when traditional approaches do not. Future research should explore the application of this additional analytic tool for accelerometer physical activity estimates.
ISSN:1440-2440
1878-1861
DOI:10.1016/j.jsams.2014.09.003