Estimating Equations for Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing Variables in Fontan Patients: Derivation and Validation Using a Multicenter Cross-Sectional Database

Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is a common method of evaluating patients with a Fontan circulation. Equations to calculate predicted CPET values are based on children with normal circulation. This study aims to create predictive equations for CPET variables solely based on patients with Fon...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Pediatric cardiology 2015-02, Vol.36 (2), p.393-401
Hauptverfasser: Butts, Ryan J., Spencer, Carolyn T., Jackson, Lanier, Heal, Martha E., Forbus, Geoffrey, Hulsey, Thomas C., Atz, Andrew M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is a common method of evaluating patients with a Fontan circulation. Equations to calculate predicted CPET values are based on children with normal circulation. This study aims to create predictive equations for CPET variables solely based on patients with Fontan circulation. Patients who performed CPET in the multicenter Pediatric Heart Network Fontan Cross-Sectional Study were screened. Peak variable equations were calculated using patients who performed a maximal test (RER > 1.1) and anaerobic threshold (AT) variable equations on patients where AT was adequately calculated. Eighty percent of each cohort was randomly selected to derive the predictive equation and the remaining served as a validation cohort. Linear regression analysis was performed for each CPET variable within the derivation cohort. The resulting equations were applied to calculate predicted values in the validation cohort. Observed versus predicted variables were compared in the validation cohort using linear regression. 411 patients underwent CPET, 166 performed maximal exercise tests and 317 had adequately calculated AT. Predictive equations for peak CPET variables had good performance; peak VO 2 , R 2  = 0.61; maximum work, R 2  = 0.61; maximum O 2 pulse, R 2  = 0.59. The equations for CPET variables at AT explained less of the variability; VO 2 at AT, R 2  = 0.15; work at AT, R 2  = 0.39; O 2 pulse at AT, R 2  = 0.34; VE/VCO 2 at AT, R 2  = 0.18; VE/VO 2 at AT, R 2  = 0.14. Only the models for VE/VCO 2 and VE/VO 2 at AT had significantly worse performance in validation cohort. Of the 8 equations for commonly measured CPET variables, six were able to be validated. The equations for peak variables were more robust in explaining variation in values than AT equations.
ISSN:0172-0643
1432-1971
DOI:10.1007/s00246-014-1020-5