The efficacy of EGFR gene mutation testing in various samples from non-small cell lung cancer patients: a multicenter retrospective study
Introduction Testing for the epidermal growth factor receptor ( EGFR ) gene mutations requires considerable multidisciplinary experience of clinicians (for appropriate patient selection), pathologists (for selection of appropriate cytological or histological material) and geneticists (for performing...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology 2015-01, Vol.141 (1), p.61-68 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Introduction
Testing for the epidermal growth factor receptor (
EGFR
) gene mutations requires considerable multidisciplinary experience of clinicians (for appropriate patient selection), pathologists (for selection of appropriate cytological or histological material) and geneticists (for performing and reporting reliable molecular tests). We present our experience on the efficacy of routine
EGFR
testing in various types of tumor samples and the frequency of
EGFR
mutations in a large series of Polish non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.
Methods
Deletions in exon 19 and substitution L858R in exon 21 of
EGFR
gene were assessed using real-time PCR techniques in 1,138 small biopsies or cytological specimens and in 1,312 surgical samples.
Results
Out of 2,450 diagnostic samples (containing >10 % of tumor cells), the occurrence of
EGFR
gene mutations was 9 %; more frequently in women (13.9 %) and adenocarcinoma patients (10 %), particularly with accompanying expression of TTF1 (13.0 %). The frequency of
EGFR
gene mutations was similar in cytological and histological specimens, and in primary and metastatic lesions, and did not depend on the percentage of tumor cells and quality of isolated DNA. Cytological or small biopsy, compared to surgical specimens showed lower percentage of tumor cells, with no impact on the quality of real-time PCR assay.
Conclusion
Cytological and small biopsy samples with low (10–20 %) content of tumor cells and specimens from metastatic lesions are a sufficient source for
EGFR
mutation testing in NSCLC patients. The incidence of
EGFR
gene mutations in examined population was similar to those reported in other Caucasian populations. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0171-5216 1432-1335 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00432-014-1789-x |