One-Unit versus Two-Unit Cord-Blood Transplantation for Hematologic Cancers
The use of two units of cord blood to reconstitute hematopoiesis in transplantation for relapsed hematologic cancers in patients 1 to 21 years of age proved to be no better and was in some ways worse than the standard one-unit transplant. Since 1993, unrelated-donor umbilical-cord blood has been use...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The New England journal of medicine 2014-10, Vol.371 (18), p.1685-1694 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The use of two units of cord blood to reconstitute hematopoiesis in transplantation for relapsed hematologic cancers in patients 1 to 21 years of age proved to be no better and was in some ways worse than the standard one-unit transplant.
Since 1993, unrelated-donor umbilical-cord blood has been used as the source of hematopoietic stem cells for transplantation in an estimated 30,000 patients with malignant and nonmalignant diseases.
1
As compared with stem-cell grafts from adult donors, cord blood has the advantages of more rapid availability, relative absence of donor attrition, and, after transplantation, a reduced risk of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) despite donor–recipient HLA disparity.
2
,
3
In addition, less restriction on HLA matching permits greater use of cord blood for members of racial minorities, who are less likely to have a suitably HLA-matched volunteer adult donor.
4
However, the use of cord blood . . . |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0028-4793 1533-4406 |
DOI: | 10.1056/NEJMoa1405584 |