Evaluation and Comparison of Anticonvulsant Activity of Telmisartan and Olmesartan in Experimentally Induced Animal Models of Epilepsy

Background : Epilepsy is one common neurological disorder requiring newer targets and newer drugs for its efficient management. In the recent days brain renin angiotensin system has gained immense importance because of its involvement in seizure regulation. Objective : To evaluate and compare antiep...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical and diagnostic research 2014-10, Vol.8 (10), p.HC08-HC11
Hauptverfasser: V H, Pushpa, Shetty K, Padmaja, R N, Suresha, M K, Jayanthi, V, Ashwini, P S, Vaibhavi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background : Epilepsy is one common neurological disorder requiring newer targets and newer drugs for its efficient management. In the recent days brain renin angiotensin system has gained immense importance because of its involvement in seizure regulation. Objective : To evaluate and compare antiepileptic activity of different doses olmesartan and telmisartan on MES and PTZ induced seizure models. Materials and Methods : Swiss albino mice weighing around 25-30g of either sex were divided into 6 groups: Control ( Distilled Water- 10ml/kg), Standard – Sodium valproate (40mg/kg), O1 – Olmesartan (2.5mg/kg), O2 – Olmesartan (5mg/kg), T1 - Telmisartan (5mg/kg), T2 – Telmisartan (10mg/kg). After 1hour of administration of control , test and standard drugs (orally), convulsions were induced by administering PTZ (70mg/kg – i.p.) in PTZ model. Seizure latency was the parameter recorded. In MES model, suppression of tonic hind limb extension was taken as measure of efficacy. Result : The results were analysed by one-way-ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s multiple comparison test. In MES test, dose dependently olmesartan and telmisartan significantly reduced the duration of tonic hindlimb extension in comparison to control (p
ISSN:2249-782X
0973-709X
DOI:10.7860/JCDR/2014/9455.5061