Outcomes of a Partnered Facilitation Strategy to Implement Primary Care–Mental Health
ABSTRACT BACKGROUND Implementing new programs and practices is challenging, even when they are mandated. Implementation Facilitation (IF) strategies that focus on partnering with sites show promise for addressing these challenges. OBJECTIVE Our aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of an external/in...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM 2014-12, Vol.29 (Suppl 4), p.904-912 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND
Implementing new programs and practices is challenging, even when they are mandated. Implementation Facilitation (IF) strategies that focus on partnering with sites show promise for addressing these challenges.
OBJECTIVE
Our aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of an external/internal IF strategy within the context of a Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) mandate of Primary Care–Mental Health Integration (PC-MHI).
DESIGN
This was a quasi-experimental, Hybrid Type III study. Generalized estimating equations assessed differences across sites.
PARTICIPANTS
Patients and providers at seven VA primary care clinics receiving the IF intervention and national support and seven matched comparison clinics receiving national support only participated in the study.
INTERVENTION
We used a highly partnered IF strategy incorporating evidence-based implementation interventions.
MAIN MEASURES
We evaluated the IF strategy using VA administrative data and RE-AIM framework measures for two 6-month periods.
KEY RESULTS
Evaluation of RE-AIM measures from the first 6-month period indicated that PC patients at IF clinics had nine times the odds (OR=8.93,
p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0884-8734 1525-1497 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s11606-014-3027-2 |