Platelet rich plasma use in allograft ACL reconstructions: Two-year clinical results of a MOON cohort study
Abstract Background Platelet rich plasma has been promoted as a biologic agent to enhance tissue healing. As a concentration of autologous growth factors, it has gained increased use in musculoskeletal applications. Methods The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of intra-operative PRP...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The knee 2013-08, Vol.20 (4), p.277-280 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Abstract Background Platelet rich plasma has been promoted as a biologic agent to enhance tissue healing. As a concentration of autologous growth factors, it has gained increased use in musculoskeletal applications. Methods The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of intra-operative PRP on patient-reported outcomes 2 years after ACL reconstruction with tibialis anterior allograft. Fifty patients who underwent allograft ACL reconstruction with intra-operative application of PRP to the graft were matched with 50 allograft ACL -reconstructions without PRP use. The same surgeon performed all procedures with identical technique. Two year patient-reported outcomes including KOOS, IKDC, and Marx activity scores were obtained. Effusions in the immediate post-operative period, post-operative complications, and any subsequent procedures were also recorded. Results There was no difference between the groups with respect to additional surgeries or complications in the first 2 years after reconstruction. Decreased effusions at 10 ± 4 days were noted in the PRP group, but this difference disappeared by 8 ± 4 weeks. No differences in patient-reported outcomes were noted in the 58 patients with two-year outcome data. Conclusion The study demonstrated that although PRP application in tibialis allograft ACL reconstructions appeared safe; clinical benefit was minor and short-term. No differences in patient-reported outcomes or number of additional surgeries at 2 years were noted. Level of evidence Level III — retrospective comparative study. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0968-0160 1873-5800 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.knee.2012.12.001 |