Development of a new diabetes risk prediction tool for incident coronary heart disease events: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis and the Heinz Nixdorf Recall Study

Abstract Objective We develop a new diabetes CHD risk estimator using traditional risk factors plus coronary artery calcium (CAC), ankle-brachial index (ABI), high sensitivity C-reactive protein, family history of CHD, and carotid intima-media thickness and compared it with United Kingdom Prospectiv...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Atherosclerosis 2014-10, Vol.236 (2), p.411-417
Hauptverfasser: Yeboah, Joseph, Erbel, Raimund, Delaney, Joseph Chris, Nance, Robin, Guo, Mengye, Bertoni, Alain G, Budoff, Matthew, Moebus, Susanne, Jöckel, Karl-Heinz, Burke, Gregory L, Wong, Nathan D, Lehmann, Nils, Herrington, David M, Möhlenkamp, Stefan, Greenland, Philip
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Objective We develop a new diabetes CHD risk estimator using traditional risk factors plus coronary artery calcium (CAC), ankle-brachial index (ABI), high sensitivity C-reactive protein, family history of CHD, and carotid intima-media thickness and compared it with United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes study (UKPDS), Framingham risk and the NCEP/ATP III risk scores in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Methods and Results We combined data from T2DM without clinical CVD in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) and the Heinz Nixdorf Recall Study ( N  = 1343). After a mean follow-up of 8.5 years, 85 (6.3%) participants had incident CHD. Among the novel risk markers, CAC best predicted CHD independent of the FRS [hazard ratio: HR (95% CI): log (CAC +25):1.69 (1.45–1.97), p  25 and ≤125:2.29 (0.87–5.95), >125 and ≤400: 3.87 (1.57–9.57), >400: 5.97 (2.57–13.84), respectively). The MESA-HNR diabetes CHD risk score has better accuracy for the main outcome versus the FRS or UKPDS [area under curve (AUC) of 0.76 vs. 0.70 and 0.69, respectively; all p  
ISSN:0021-9150
1879-1484
DOI:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2014.07.035