Do personality traits conform to lists or hierarchies?
•Do personality traits mostly conform to lists or hierarchies?•Data: adjective ratings and scores on basic personality inventory scales.•Goldberg’s “bass-ackwards” method applied for series of 1–12 factors.•List- rather than hierarchy-type structure predominantly observed. Are personality traits mos...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Personality and individual differences 2014-11, Vol.70, p.51-56 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •Do personality traits mostly conform to lists or hierarchies?•Data: adjective ratings and scores on basic personality inventory scales.•Goldberg’s “bass-ackwards” method applied for series of 1–12 factors.•List- rather than hierarchy-type structure predominantly observed.
Are personality traits mostly related to one another in hierarchical fashion, or as a simple list? Does extracting an additional personality factor in a factor analysis tend to subdivide an existing factor, or does it just add a new one? Goldberg’s “bass-ackwards” method was used to address this question, based on rotations of 1–12 factors. Two sets of data were employed: ratings by 320 undergraduates using 435 personality-descriptive adjectives, and 512 Oregon community members’ responses to 184 scales from 8 personality inventories. In both, the view was supported that personality trait structure tends not to be strongly hierarchical: allowing an additional dimension usually resulted in a new substantive dimension rather than in the splitting of an old one, and once traits emerged they tended to persist. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0191-8869 1873-3549 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.paid.2014.06.018 |