Do personality traits conform to lists or hierarchies?

•Do personality traits mostly conform to lists or hierarchies?•Data: adjective ratings and scores on basic personality inventory scales.•Goldberg’s “bass-ackwards” method applied for series of 1–12 factors.•List- rather than hierarchy-type structure predominantly observed. Are personality traits mos...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Personality and individual differences 2014-11, Vol.70, p.51-56
Hauptverfasser: Loehlin, John C., Goldberg, Lewis R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Do personality traits mostly conform to lists or hierarchies?•Data: adjective ratings and scores on basic personality inventory scales.•Goldberg’s “bass-ackwards” method applied for series of 1–12 factors.•List- rather than hierarchy-type structure predominantly observed. Are personality traits mostly related to one another in hierarchical fashion, or as a simple list? Does extracting an additional personality factor in a factor analysis tend to subdivide an existing factor, or does it just add a new one? Goldberg’s “bass-ackwards” method was used to address this question, based on rotations of 1–12 factors. Two sets of data were employed: ratings by 320 undergraduates using 435 personality-descriptive adjectives, and 512 Oregon community members’ responses to 184 scales from 8 personality inventories. In both, the view was supported that personality trait structure tends not to be strongly hierarchical: allowing an additional dimension usually resulted in a new substantive dimension rather than in the splitting of an old one, and once traits emerged they tended to persist.
ISSN:0191-8869
1873-3549
DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2014.06.018