Do crystal structures obviate the need for theoretical models of GPCRs for structure-based virtual screening?

Recent highly expected structural characterizations of agonist‐bound and antagonist‐bound beta‐2 adrenoreceptor (β2AR) by X‐ray crystallography have been widely regarded as critical advances to enable more effective structure‐based discovery of GPCRs ligands. It appears that this very important deve...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Proteins, structure, function, and bioinformatics structure, function, and bioinformatics, 2012-06, Vol.80 (6), p.1503-1521
Hauptverfasser: Tang, Hao, Wang, Xiang Simon, Hsieh, Jui-Hua, Tropsha, Alexander
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Recent highly expected structural characterizations of agonist‐bound and antagonist‐bound beta‐2 adrenoreceptor (β2AR) by X‐ray crystallography have been widely regarded as critical advances to enable more effective structure‐based discovery of GPCRs ligands. It appears that this very important development may have undermined many previous efforts to develop 3D theoretical models of GPCRs. To address this question directly, we have compared several historical β2AR models versus the inactive state and nanobody‐stabilized active state of β2AR crystal structures in terms of their structural similarity and effectiveness of use in virtual screening for β2AR specific agonists and antagonists. Theoretical models, incluing both homology and de novo types, were collected from five different groups who have published extensively in the field of GPCRs modeling. All models were built before X‐ray structures became available. In general, β2AR theoretical models differ significantly from the crystal structure in terms of TMH definition and the global packing. Nevertheless, surprisingly, several models afforded hit rates resulting from virtual screening of large chemical library enriched by known β2AR ligands that exceeded those using X‐ray structures. The hit rates were particularly higher for agonists. Furthemore, the screening performance of models is associated with local structural quality, such as the RMSDs for binding pocket residues and the ability to capture accurately, most if not all critical protein/ligand interactions. These results suggest that carefully built models of GPCRs could capture critical chemical and structural features of the binding pocket, and thus may be even more useful for practical structure‐based drug discovery than X‐ray structures. Proteins 2012. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
ISSN:0887-3585
1097-0134
DOI:10.1002/prot.24035