Characterisation of Familial Colorectal Cancer Type X, Lynch syndrome, and non-familial colorectal cancer
Background: Familial Colorectal Cancer Type X (FCCTX) is defined as individuals with colorectal cancer (CRC) who families meet Amsterdam Criteria-1 (AC1), but whose tumours are DNA-mismatch-repair-proficient, unlike Lynch syndrome (LS). FCCTX does not have an increased risk of extra-colonic cancers....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | British journal of cancer 2014-07, Vol.111 (3), p.598-602 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background:
Familial Colorectal Cancer Type X (FCCTX) is defined as individuals with colorectal cancer (CRC) who families meet Amsterdam Criteria-1 (AC1), but whose tumours are DNA-mismatch-repair-proficient, unlike Lynch syndrome (LS). FCCTX does not have an increased risk of extra-colonic cancers. This analysis compares epidemiologic and clinicopathologic features among FCCTX, LS, and ‘non-familial’ (non-AC1) CRC cases.
Methods:
From the Colon Cancer Family Registry, FCCTX (
n
=173), LS (
n
=303), and non-AC1 (
n
=9603) CRC cases were identified. Questionnaire-based epidemiologic information and CRC pathologic features were compared across case groups using polytomous logistic regression.
Results:
Compared with LS, FCCTX cases were less likely to be current (
vs
never) smokers; have a proximal subsite (
vs
rectal) tumour; or have mucinous histology, poor differentiation, or tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes. There were no observed differences in co-morbidities or medication usage.
Conclusions:
FCCTX were less likely to be current tobacco users; other exposures were similar between these groups. Histopathologic differences highly suggestive of LS CRCs do not appear to be shared by FCCTX. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0007-0920 1532-1827 |
DOI: | 10.1038/bjc.2014.309 |