Rabeprazole test for the diagnosis of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: results of a study in a primary care setting

To determine the diagnostic value of the rabeprazole test in patients seen by general practitioners. Eighty-three patients with symptoms suggestive of GERD were enrolled by general practitioners in this multi-centre, randomized and double-blind study. All patients received either rabeprazole (20 mg...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:World journal of gastroenterology : WJG 2006-04, Vol.12 (16), p.2569-2573
Hauptverfasser: des Varannes, Stanislas Bruley, Sacher-Huvelin, Sylvie, Vavasseur, Fabienne, Masliah, Claude, Le Rhun, Marc, Aygalenq, Philippe, Bonnot-Marlier, Sylvie, Lequeux, Yves, Galmiche, Jean Paul
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To determine the diagnostic value of the rabeprazole test in patients seen by general practitioners. Eighty-three patients with symptoms suggestive of GERD were enrolled by general practitioners in this multi-centre, randomized and double-blind study. All patients received either rabeprazole (20 mg bid) or a placebo for one week. The diagnosis of GERD was established on the presence of mucosal breaks at endoscopy and/or an abnormal esophageal 24-h pH test. The test was considered to be positive if patients reported at least a "clear improvement" of symptoms on a 7-point Likert scale. The sensitivities of the test for rabeprazole and the placebo were 83% and 40%, respectively. The corresponding specificity, positive and negative predictive values were 45% and 67%, 71% and 71%, and 62% and 35%, respectively. A receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis confirmed that the best discriminatory cut-off corresponded to description of "clear improvement". The poor specificity of the proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) test does not support such an approach to establish a diagnosis of GERD in a primary care setting.
ISSN:1007-9327
2219-2840
DOI:10.3748/wjg.v12.i16.2569